- Special Projects
Senate Bill 655, and the access it promised members of the media covering emergencies, looked like it was in trouble.
Known as the “media-access bill,” it had not been assigned Senate negotiators as of April 24, though the House conferees had been appointed a week earlier.
With a Thursday deadline for non-money bills looming, SB 655 appeared to be on life support, as Civil Beat reported. But the Senate did end up picking negotiators for the measure, and by mid-afternoon on the deadline day the two sides compromised on the bill’s final language.
“I think we have agreement on this bill,” said Sen. Clarence Nishihara.
“Yes,” said Rep. Gregg Takayama, who noted that the only change was removing the word “credentialed” — as in credentialed media — from the bill.
What happened to SB 655 in the waning days of the Legislature underscores just how difficult it is to predict the outcome of legislation, especially during the conference committee period, which mostly occurs behind closed doors.
Scores of other bills were killed late last week — some with explanations (such as House or Senate leaders of the money committees not giving their OK), and many with none at all.
Takayama said SB 655 was never really in trouble. While the Senate walked away from the table last year, this time around, he said, “There has not ever been real big disagreements among us” regarding the issue.
Final passage of the bill would be a victory for the media and the public, as it allows reporters access to areas that are otherwise closed because they are under emergency management. Its backers include three Big Island senators who said the volcanic lava flow that threatened Puna communities in 2014 and 2015 showed how important it is for the public to know what’s going on.
Takayama, a former television and print reporter, agreed.
“It’s a truly important function,” he said
The bill contains a caveat, however: It’s up to the emergency department or agency in charge to grant the media access.
“And we think that’s a reasonable limitation, because all the reporters in Hawaii are used to operating under certain restrictions,” said Takayama, citing as examples crime scene and covering U.S. presidents. “I think it’s a natural thing and not unreasonable to allow our emergency responders to decide when the media can have access and under what conditions.”
As for removing the word “credentialed,” Takayama explained that press credentials are not given out anymore in such circumstances.
SB 655 stayed alive, but that was not the case with a proposal to make permanent the existing liability protections for lifeguards.
Senate Bill 562 started out asking for exactly that, and had the emphatic support of county officials who worried that they would not be able to afford putting lifeguards on beaches after the current liability expires June 30. As Civil Beat has reported, drowning is a serious problem in Hawaii, especially for visitors.
And yet, SB 562 was amended by the House to delete its reference to the sunset date and to instead require that the state attorney general “defend any civil action against the county based on negligence, wrongful act, or omission of a county lifeguard for services at a designated state beach park” under agreement between the state and a county.
SB 562 went down to the final day of the conference committee period, but not before the Senate actually took the step of discharging its conferees — a way of saying in frustration, “We give up.”
Thus the Senate blinked and agreed to the House version.
Senate Majority Leader J. Kalani English, who introduced the bill, issued a press release stating, “I will continue to pursue this issue and introduce a bill next session to try to restore immunity for the lifeguards.”
His statement also explained, “it was made clear the House was steadfast in their position.”
What was not stated, but what seems clear, is that personal injury lawyers will now be able to sue the counties on behalf of clients harmed in ocean incidents. The Maui News reported that the personal injury lawyers’ association supported the House amendments.
Here’s what Stacy Crivello, a Maui County Council member and president of the Hawaii State Association of Counties, had to say about SB 562:
HSAC, which represents the four counties, is extremely disappointed at the Legislature’s decision not to extend the liability protection for our lifeguards at county beaches past the sunset date of June 30, 2017. This move is devastating to the counties and the morale of lifeguards, who risk their lives everyday in keeping our residents and visitors safe at our Hawaii beaches. This decision by state lawmakers puts beachgoers’ safety at risk, subjects the lifeguards to being sued personally and translates to burdensome lawsuit costs footed by local taxpayers.
HSAC, which represents the four counties, is extremely disappointed at the Legislature’s decision not to extend the liability protection for our lifeguards at county beaches past the sunset date of June 30, 2017. This move is devastating to the counties and the morale of lifeguards, who risk their lives everyday in keeping our residents and visitors safe at our Hawaii beaches.
This decision by state lawmakers puts beachgoers’ safety at risk, subjects the lifeguards to being sued personally and translates to burdensome lawsuit costs footed by local taxpayers.
Of note: Several personal injury lawyers serve in the Legislature.
And then there were the many bills that died outright during the conference committee period. One that drew a lot of attention was Senate Bill 249, which called for reducing the pensions of state judges.
The bill received zero testimony in support and a whole lot of testimony in opposition. It was characterized as unfairly singling out the judiciary for punishment, and was the subject of a House floor fight that led Republican Rep. Gene Ward to seek an opinion from the attorney general as to whether freedom of speech had been curtailed in the course of discussion over SB 249.
Ward complained that fellow Republican Cynthia Thielen was forced by House Majority Leader Scott Saiki to retract comments she made on the House floor arguing that the Legislature was trying to “punish” the Judiciary with the bill.
(The AG opined that it was unclear and directed Ward’s inquiry to the House, which is controlled by Democrats. Ward described the opinion as a “milquetoast response.”)
SB 249 was deferred in the waning minutes before a Friday 6 p.m. deadline for money bills. Among those in attendance at the conference committee hearing room was Rodney Maile, administrative director of the courts, who has steadfastly followed the bill’s progress.
Maile told Civil Beat that the courts were grateful for the deferral, and expressed appreciation for the testimony that may have swayed legislators to change their minds.
Lawmakers will cast final votes on all remaining bills beginning Tuesday in advance of Thursday’s adjournment. At the top of the heap is Senate Bill 1183, the measure that seeks to levy a surcharge on the state hotel tax to pail for Honolulu rail. The Senate will begin deliberations at 10 a.m. and the House at 9 a.m.
Here’s the status of other measures of interest: