Don't Back Down On Financial Disclosure Requirement For State Boards - Honolulu Civil Beat

Power local, independent journalism with a gift today and help us reach our goal of $250,000 by December 31.

Thanks to 674 donors, we've raised $100,000 so far!


Power local, independent journalism with a gift today and help us reach our goal of $250,000 by December 31.

Thanks to 674 donors, we've raised $100,000 so far!


About the Author

Civil Beat Editorial Board

The members of The Civil Beat Editorial Board are Chad Blair, Patti Epler, Nathan Eagle, Lee Cataluna, Kim Gamel and John Hill. Opinions expressed by the editorial board reflect the group’s consensus view. Not all members may participate in every interview or essay. Chad Blair, the Politics and Opinion Editor, can be reached at

There’s an old adage that there are certain topics best not brought up at the dinner table. They include sex, religion and politics.

Opinion article badge

Money is also often part of that list, but money is something that very much needs to be talked about — especially in politics and government.

This year, bills before the Hawaii Legislature would prohibit the public from learning about compensation paid to members of top boards and commissions from a variety of sources.  The main argument is that sharing financial information on financial disclosure forms turns off a lot of folks who might otherwise be willing to volunteer for government service.

Two bills propose that the Hawaii State Ethics Commission redact the financial amount ranges. As the legislation explains — in both House Bill 1849 and Senate Bill 2123, introduced by the House Speaker and Senate president on the part of unidentified parties — “community members who are most qualified to serve are often not willing to pursue a seat on state boards or commissions because of the requirement that financial disclosures be made public. Those individuals and their businesses often value privacy concerning compensation.”

Removing this requirement, the legislation contends, would “increase the size and quality of the pool of candidates,” thus benefitting Hawaii.

Actually, blacking out the dollar ranges — for instance, $50,000 but less than $100,000 — would only raise doubts about the sincerity and interests of the candidates to serve on more than a dozen state boards, commissions and agencies.

Capitol building.
The Hawaii State Capitol, where some legislators want to hide financial information on boards and commissions from the public. Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2022

They include the University of Hawaii Board of Regents, the Board of Land and Natural Resources, the Land Use Commission, the Board of Agriculture, the Hawaii Community Development Authority, the Hawaiian Homes Commission and a dozen more boards, commissions and agencies along with the State Ethics Commission itself, the entity responsible for documenting the disclosures and posting them online.

These boards make important decisions that deeply influence the direction of state policies and impact nearly everyone in Hawaii. They also involve a lot of public monies.

Testimony in opposition to HB 1849, which was heard last week, made it all too clear why the proposed change in statute is a move “in the wrong direction,” as Ethics Commission Executive Director Robert Harris wrote:

“Reducing public transparency in this manner weakens public confidence in the actions of these individuals and their respective boards and commissions, which is contrary to the purpose of the state ethics laws. Moreover, without knowing the amount of a Board or Commission member’s financial interest, a public stakeholder could not reasonably evaluate the potential of a conflict of interest.”

Sandy Ma, executive director of Common Cause Hawaii, testified, “Redaction of financial disclosure information serves no good government purpose, especially when many non-paid volunteer boards hold tremendous power.”

Douglas Meller of the League of Women Voters of Hawaii’s legislative committee pointed out that these very board members “can authorize private use of public property or spend public funds for private benefit.”

One Down, One To Go

On Friday, HB 1849 was deferred indefinitely in the House, but that does not end the chances for the legislation to pass. Rep. Angus McKelvey, the chair of the House Government Reform Committee, noted that the Senate companion “has fewer committees” — suggesting it could be easier to advance.

SB 2123 now awaits a hearing in that chamber, and it might well receive one, as the proposal has lots of influential proponents.

The testimony in support of the House version included Land Use Commission executive officer Daniel Orodenker; Christian Fern, executive director of the University of Hawaii Executive Assembly; Tim Dolan, a UH vice president and UH Foundation CEO; and Department of Transportation Director Jade Butay.

“We must take steps to increase the pool of qualified candidates willing to voluntarily serve on boards and commissions and amending — but not eliminating — the financial disclosure is one important step that could help,” wrote Randy Perreira, executive director of the Hawaii Government Employees Association.

The desire to change financial disclosure requirements did not arise in a vacuum. David Lassner, the UH president, noted in his supporting testimony that UH strongly opposed legislation in 2014 that made financial information of the members of the Board of Regents publicly available.

“Four sitting regents resigned when the Legislature changed the conditions of their public service,” he wrote. “They had provided their financial disclosures for Ethics Commission review but were not willing to have their privacy and that of their families compromised. In the years since, we have seen declining numbers of applications from individuals willing and interested to serve as regents.”

In addition to the four regents, members of the LUC, the ADC, the BLNR and the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation board walked off the job, too.

Then Gov. Neil Abercrombie, who had his own odd reasons for opposing the 2014 bill — he claimed it would hurt women and discourage their government service — let it become law without his signature.

This is also not the first time the Legislature has toyed with tinkering with the statute. In 2018 there was a move to water down the financial disclosures, and for much the same silly reasons. The Senate version made it all the way to conference committee before dying.

The Senate Should Act

Today, based on the submitted testimony for HB 1849, a large number of leaders from the private sector also want to keep financial figures private.

Among them are Michael Pietsch, president of Title Guaranty of Hawaii; Ed Schultz, president and CEO of Hawaiian Host Group; Josh Feldman, president and CEO of Tori Richard; Emily Porter, COO at MacNaughton; Paul Yonamine, executive chair of Central Pacific Bank; John Morgan, president of Kualoa Ranch; Kris Nakagawa, a vice president at Young Brothers; Sean M. Nakamura, corporate controller and treasurer at Island Holdings; Meli James, president of the Hawaii Venture Capital Association; and Chuck Bergson, president and CEO at Pacific Media Group.

“By removing irrelevant personal information from public disclosure — information that is not relevant to assessing any conflict of a board member — we believe that the state will attract the right individuals who are willing to serve our state on a Board or Commission by giving of their time, skills and wisdom,” testified Brandon Kurisu, president of the University of Hawaii Alumni Association.

It is encouraging to see executives from such a broad and distinguished swath of Hawaii businesses and organizations wanting to improve government service. But their many rationalizations are weak and sometimes simply wrong.

Brian Black, executive director of the Civil Beat Law Center for the Public, poked a big hole in one of HB 1849’s main arguments: “None of the 17 relevant boards have more than one vacancy currently. In contrast, other state boards and commissions — whose members’ financial disclosure statements are not publicly posted — have multiple long-standing vacancies.”

In fact, says Black, there are “plenty” of qualified individuals in the state who are not deterred by publicly identifying their conflicts of interest. If someone is not willing to be transparent, he adds, “that person may not be the best person to represent the people of Hawaii on a civilian oversight board.”

The Legislature should not be trying to fix something that is not broken.

Click on the links to contact the following Senate chairs to ask them to scrap SB 2123: Sharon Moriwaki on Government Operations, Karl Rhoads on Judiciary and Donovan Dela Cruz on Ways and Means.

Read this next:

The Civil Beat Editorial Board Interview: State Sen. Donovan Dela Cruz

Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.


About the Author

Civil Beat Editorial Board

The members of The Civil Beat Editorial Board are Chad Blair, Patti Epler, Nathan Eagle, Lee Cataluna, Kim Gamel and John Hill. Opinions expressed by the editorial board reflect the group’s consensus view. Not all members may participate in every interview or essay. Chad Blair, the Politics and Opinion Editor, can be reached at

Latest Comments (0)

Good points CB Editorial group! I too prefer board members serving the public interest and making significant financial, employment, and policy decisions for the state to disclose their investments and debt. It does matter how much they are paid by or earn from other entities and how much they are indebted. The state should stop picking from the same small business-insider group and look to other well-qualified individuals who are not afraid to disclose.

BusRider33 · 1 year ago

I served on a State board for 22 years - and resigned the day the governor signed the public financial disclosure bill into law. I was happy to submit my annual financial disclosure documents with the Ethics Commission - as I had no financial holdings remotely related to actions taken by the Board. I would be happy to do that again and have no financial secrets from anyone who has a need and legitimate right to know - and responsibility to protect - my financial details from the uncountable fraudsters who would like to take advantage of those details for their own benefit. The legislature claims that there is no risk associated with public disclosure - but in the next breath, refuses to indemnify anyone who makes such a disclosure against any losses they may suffer from that action. I have been repeatedly asked by the executive of that agency to return to the Board - my answer is always the same: when the State recognizes that I have a right to privacy and a right to protect my financial security, I will be happy to serve.

drradon · 1 year ago

As governor, I asked Earl Bakken, founder of Medtronic and developer of the "first external, battery-operated, transistorized, wearable artificial pacemaker" who was living on the Big Island and was a big patron of the North Kahala Hospital, to serve on the UH Board of Regents, he declined mainly due to the onerous financial disclosure requirements. Actor Richard Chamberlin resigned for the same reason after only serving only a month on PBS. Pierre Omidyar,founder of Civil Beat, would be an outstanding UH regent. Does the Civil Beat Editorial Board think he would serve?

bjcayetano · 1 year ago

Join the conversation


IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email to submit an idea.


You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.