Two years ago, Civil Beat posted a piece I wrote about chlorpyrifos, a pesticide (also known as Dursban and Lorsban) the agrichemical companies on Kauai use on their biotech crops as much or more than any other.

This is the pesticide investigators found in every sample taken at Waimea Canyon Middle School after dozens of schoolchildren complaining of disorientation, severe headaches and nausea repeatedly were taken to the hospital—the investigation that notoriously concluded their symptoms were probably due to exposure to stinkweed.

I pointed out that chlorpyrifos, a potent neurotoxin, can permanently lower a child’s IQ. Organophosphates, such as chlorpyrifos, work by blocking an enzyme that controls messages that travel between nerve cells. When the enzyme is blocked, this causes overstimulation of neuronal cells, neurotoxicity and eventually death.

A farmer applies pesticide to a fallow field. The health effects of drift from such applications of chlorpyrifos have the potential to be severe and permanent, the author writes.

A farmer applies pesticide to a fallow field. The health effects of drift from such applications of chlorpyrifos have the potential to be severe and permanent, the author writes.

Zeynel Cebeci/Wikimedia Commons

It operates the same way in people. But peer-reviewed studies establish that even short-term exposure to chlorpyrifos can cause permanent injury. A Harvard study states, for instance, “Dose-related correlations were recorded between maternal exposures to chlorpyrifos or other organophosphates and small head circumference at birth — which is an indication of slowed brain growth in utero — and with neurobehavioural deficits that have persisted to at least 7 years of age. …MRI of the brain showed that prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure was associated with structural abnormalities that included thinning of the cerebral cortex.”

In other words, the science establishes that children born to mothers exposed to this pesticide had brain damage.

A reply was quickly forthcoming from Steve Savage, a former employee of DuPont (parent of Pioneer) and Mycogen, a Dow subsidiary. Savage criticized me for misinforming the public and fear-mongering. Savage often writes for the Genetic Literacy Project, which promotes pesticides and genetic engineering and accuses critics of being “anti-science” as well as “illiterate.”

Savage compared chlorpyrifos to caffeine and aspirin and assured readers its use is safe. This belittling of concerns and “anti-science” meme from industry bloggers has become a familiar industry tactic.

More recently, Civil Beat published an article by public relations professional Jan TenBruggencate. TenBruggencate completely misunderstood the relevant circumstances at Waimea Canyon School, noting that no Roundup had been sprayed before the incidents, although I’m not aware of anyone familiar with the matter ever suggesting that Roundup had been the problem.

Two months ago EPA proposed to revoke all tolerances for the pesticide. This hopefully will end not only all uses of chlorpyrifos resulting in residues on food and contamination of drinking water, but those resulting in drift to schools, homes and other places people are located, as well.

TenBruggencate never mentioned chlorpyrifos or that it had been detected on site. Despite being uninformed (I’m assuming this was not intentional misdirection), he declared that stinkweed had “launched Kauai’s pesticide wars,” plainly suggesting that those suspecting a toxic pesticide was the problem — or perhaps any problem at all on Kauai — are sadly ignorant.

Against this background, it’s noteworthy, first, that EPA banned all household uses of chlorpyrifos 15 years ago because it’s too toxic to allow children to be exposed to it. Then in December 2014, EPA acknowledged the extensive body of peer-reviewed science correlating chlorpyrifos exposure with brain damage to children, including reduced IQ, delayed development, and loss of working memory.

Two months ago EPA, apparently not persuaded that chlorpyrifos is no more harmful than caffeine or aspirin, proposed to go much further and revoke all tolerances for the pesticide. This hopefully will end not only all uses of chlorpyrifos resulting in residues on food and contamination of drinking water, but those resulting in drift to schools, homes and other places people are located, as well.

The public comment period on this proposal closed on Jan. 5; along with 80,000 other comments urging EPA to ban the pesticide, the agency received a letter from more than 65 environmental health scientists and healthcare professionals, citing extensive evidence that chlorpyrifos harms children.

I wouldn’t be very surprised if our “Good Neighbors,” the chemical companies on Kauai, Maui, Molokai and Oahu, are at this moment energetically lobbying EPA to exempt them from any action the agency ultimately takes to further restrict chlorpyrifos use, arguing that the voluminous scientific evidence is somehow inadequate and directing their attorneys to challenge any restriction that costs them anything.

No matter how strong the scientific evidence is that chlorpyrifos presents an unreasonable threat to health, I wouldn’t be very surprised if the biotech industry’s bloggers don’t assure you that all of this concern is just more anti-science fear-mongering — that the real problem clearly is stinkweed.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

About the Author