Tom Yamachika: The Pitfalls Of The Subcontractor Deduction - Honolulu Civil Beat


About the Author

Tom Yamachika

Tom Yamachika is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

This week we’ll look at another general excise tax exemption that the State Auditor has put under the microscope in Report No. 20-05. It affects the construction industry, and the price tag the auditor put on it, based on 2018 numbers, was $19 million.

The primary benefit of this exemption occurs when a construction contractor hires and pays other people qualifying as contractors to build a project.

Suppose, for example, a general contractor is paid $100,000 to build an annex to an existing house. The general contractor hires a plumber and an electrician, paying $5,000 to each.

Current law says that the plumber and electrician pay the general excise tax on the $5,000 each that they get, and that the general contractor is only taxed on the remaining $90,000. If a subcontractor needs to sub out part of its job, say the electrician needs to hire another electrician and pays the second one $2,000, the same rules apply at that level.

 

A screen shot from the State Auditor’s May 2020 report, which addresses tax exemptions for construction contractors. Screenshot/2020

The first electrician pays GET on only $3,000, and the total tax on the project remains the same.

There are, of course, wrinkles.

First, the contractor hiring the subcontractor needs to be a contractor in the construction industry. Many vendors who do work for the government are called contractors, but they do not qualify as contractors in the GET sense.

Next, if money is paid to someone not a contractor, then the special treatment fails. Let’s say the plumber hired a design consultant and bought pipes from a supply house, and paid each $1,000. The plumber still needs to pay GET on the $5,000, and the plumber’s vendors each need to pay GET on the $1,000 as well, although at the 0.5% tax rate, assuming the transaction is documented properly.

If we suspended this GET provision as we did in 2011-2013, then all sub-vendors would be in the same situation as the plumber in this example. The general contractor would have to pay GET on the whole $100,000. Each sub-vendor, and each sub-sub-vendor, would have to pay GET as well.

The result would be even higher construction prices than what we are suffering through now. Is that what we want when the lack of housing, affordable or otherwise, is a major problem here?

At the same time, the complexity of the current system is a major problem. Many of the clients I’ve represented were confused over at least some of the aspects of the subcontract deduction system I’ve briefly explained above.

Maybe we should transition over to a simpler system. Guam has a gross receipts tax, and they had a subcontract deduction system like the one in Hawaii until 2010.

As we have written about before, Guam’s system is that there is no subcontract deduction, so the general contractor pays tax on the whole contract, but the subcontractors are exempt on their payments from the general contractor.

In theory, that system yields the same tax revenue as the current one, but there are fewer moving parts. Issues about whether the subcontractors are really subcontractors or are simply wholesalers can be sorted out at the vendor level without putting the tax on the main contract at risk.

And if for policy reasons we want to forgo GET on the main contract, such as if the contract is to build affordable housing, then we allow an exemption at the general contractor level instead of increasing complexity by letting the exemption propagate through to all of the subcontractors.

How about that, lawmakers? Let’s do something constructive for the construction industry and our economy.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

It’s Never Been Safer To Enter Hawaii Hospitals


Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.

Contribute

About the Author

Tom Yamachika

Tom Yamachika is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.


Latest Comments (0)

Thanks Mr Y. for the arcane tax knowledge.  We are picking up what you are laying down.GET should just be jettisoned.  Simpler is best.  The pyramid effect sucks the purchasing power right out of our grip and transfers it to the state.  I already know what I need to purchase.  I live on a mountain.  The train won't go there.  Promise.

Ranger_MC · 2 years ago

. Q When is the last time a Hawaii law LOWERED our cost of living, rather than raised it?ANeverThis is here is a good idea, to lower housing costs a bit, not raise them.We need to stimulate our economy, grow our way out our economic abyss. Everyone knows that is the ONLY solution. Removing the General Excise Tax on food & healthcare would be another good start. Taxing our dying healthcare sector is not a good look for the aloha state, especially during a pandemic. Especially as the ONLY state in the union doing that.Fruit tree orchards and airplane leasing get GET exemption (yep, they do !), healthcare mostdef should too ..

KeoniYamada · 2 years ago

Aside from the impossibly convoluted rules surrounding the G.E.T., the most significant problem with it is our reliance on this most regressive tax for such a significant portion of our state/county revenue. But I wouldn't expect the lawmakers elected with the backing of Hawaii's power elite to agree with that conclusion.

Jray · 2 years ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

[class^="wpforms-"]
[class^="wpforms-"]

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.