Tom Yamachika: Will Legislators Tinker With The Tax Code To Raise Cash? - Honolulu Civil Beat

To ensure our nonprofit newsroom has the resources to continue our impactful reporting, we need to welcome 500 new donors and raise $100,000 by September 5.

We've raised $6,000 toward our $100,000 goal!

Donate Now

More than 50 donors have already made gifts during our summer campaign!

To ensure our nonprofit newsroom has the resources to continue our impactful reporting, we need to welcome 500 new donors and raise $100,000 by September 5.

We've raised $6,000 toward our $100,000 goal!

Donate Now

More than 50 donors have already made gifts during our summer campaign!

About the Author

Tom Yamachika

Tom Yamachika is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

Our Legislature will be reopening soon, and some lawmakers are undoubtedly thinking of ways to make our budget balance because the grim reality is that much of our economic engine has ground to a halt and is no longer spinning out tax revenues.

Our State Auditor has thought about this too, and came out with Report 20-05.

Following the Great Recession of 2008, our lawmakers enacted Act 105 of 2011. That statute suspended the operation of several exemptions and other taxpayer-favorable provisions under the General Excise and Use Tax Laws from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2013.

The State Auditor, in his report, tried to put a price tag on all of the previously suspended exemptions using 2018 activity. He apparently thought that some lawmakers would be interested in switching off some or all of those exemptions again.

Of these, the one that seems to be the most lucrative is the exemption of sales of tangible personal property to the federal government, priced at $49 million. But it has a history that needs to be understood.

This exemption, HRS section 237-25, is a strange beast. It says that if you sell tangible personal property to the government and nothing else, then what the government pays you is exempt from GET.

Legislature 2020 opening day Senate press conference with Senate President Kouchi and Majority Leader J Kalani English.
The Hawaii Legislature is scheduled to reconvene later this month, perhaps hungry for tax revenue. Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2020

However, it says that if you sell tangible personal property and services together, then there is no exemption either for the tangible personal property or the services. Thus, if a government office needs a new TV and pays $1,000 for it, none of the $1,000 is subject to GET.

But if the TV needs repair and the technician that comes to do it charges $200 for parts and $300 for labor, then all $500 is subject to tax.

Why does this exemption work so strangely? Part of the reason may have to do with a complementary tax law called the Hawaii Use Tax.

Buying Power

Normally, if a buyer has a choice between buying a local product in a sale subject to GET and an out-of-state product in a sale not subject to GET, and the buyer chooses the latter, then we impose tax on the buyer, at the same rate as the GET, so the tax isn’t a factor in the buyer’s decision (and so the state gets its tax either way).

If the buyer is the federal government, however, this system doesn’t work because no state can tax the federal government. The government could bring in goods from out of state with no tax consequence.

We hope that lawmakers think before going down the wrong path.

So, for tangible personal property we needed to get our tax out of the way to help our local businesses sell to the government on a level playing field. Not so for services, however, because if a seller, wherever located, comes here to do physical work, the seller is subject to our GET. There wasn’t the same need to exempt local competitors.

Lawmakers also need to understand that when the government buys goods, its tremendous buying power often results in contracts with thinner-than-usual profit margins.

Changing the law to charge vendors 4% or 4.5% tax on those contracts may make the contracts money-losing propositions. That’s why when the exemption was suspended in 2011, there was a mad rush to qualify every existing contract for grandfather clause protection through last-minute contract amendments.

As a result, the tax brought in by the suspension of this exemption fell short of expectations.

Many of the exemptions that were suspended by the 2011 act had similar back stories. This is just one of them.

As we have said before, tinkering with the tax code to raise more money has the effect of putting the brakes on what little spin we have left on our economic engine. We hope that lawmakers think long and hard before deciding to go down this path once again.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Read this next:

Danny De Gracia: Let's Use The COVID-19 Crisis To Improve Hawaii's Schools

Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.


About the Author

Tom Yamachika

Tom Yamachika is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

Latest Comments (0)

Like the film industry the to encourage economic diversification, the State offers tax exemptions.  Lift the tax exemption and they go elsewhere.For the state what would have the greatest impact would be to furlough and lay off.  It's happened to several businesses in the state.  But still the state thinks they are immune to the economy despite being funded by it.

surferx808 · 2 years ago

Traditional approaches to raising tax revenues do not work well in a globalized world. People are content with paying taxes to the locality where they live only as long as they consider such taxes to be fair and see a good return (in the form of high-quality public services) on the taxes they pay. When this is no longer the case, they either move or restructure their business in a way that circumvents taxation. Therefore, I see no room to further increase the taxation of Hawaii residents. Two areas where room for increased taxation does exist are 1) profits made in Hawaii by non-Hawaii residents (e.g., non-resident landlords and hotel owners); 2) real estate purchases by non-Hawaii residents (or recent arrivals).

Chiquita · 2 years ago

Thanks Mr Y.  Another great election yr article.Like I've said in previous comments on your articles, I for one am glad that you were a paduan jedi early in life on all things tax.  "These are not the taxes you are looking for."But for our state sith, their view of taxes are "...we will be with you always..."

Ranger_MC · 2 years ago

Join the conversation


IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email to submit an idea.


You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.