Driving down Farrington Highway along the Leeward Coast two things are unavoidable: large trucks hauling construction debris and homemade signs protesting their destination, the PVT construction and debris landfill in Nanakuli.
“Most of the residents on the west coast are Native Hawaiians and don’t want them taking over more of the land,” said 31-year-old Jeff Voa, who is raising his five children with his wife at the base of Pu’u Haleakala, a peak in Nanakuli that offers sweeping views of the town.
Voa’s house abuts an empty field where the PVT Land Co. hopes to expand its landfill operation. Voa says that while an increase in trucks and noise from the landfill would be annoying, he’s more concerned about the landfill’s impact on Pu’u Heleakala, which holds an important place in Hawaiian culture and legend.
“When I take my kids up the mountain we have to look across PVT,” he said. “And OK, we appreciate PVT for what they do, and I work in construction, but we don’t want the landfill here.”
The Voa Family regularly climbs Pu’u Heleakala and doesn’t want the landfill to extend any closer to the base of the mountain.
Courtesy of Jeff Voa
Civil Beat’s environmental podcast has received a number of questions about how PVT’s expansion could affect the health of local residents, and we received even more questions after the Hawaii Legislature passed a bill requiring a half-mile buffer zone between landfills and houses, schools or hospitals. The latest episode of “Are We Doomed?” takes a tour of the PVT landfill and talks to local residents about land use along the Leeward Coast.
A Growing Footprint
The PVT landfill started accepting construction and debris waste in 1985, and in recent years the company has been digging up sections of the landfill to extract recyclable material buried in the past.
PVT’s permit allows them to accept up to 2,000 tons of construction and demolition debris a day and up to 500 tons of asbestos-contaminated waste per week.
Claire Caulfield/Civil Beat
But the company says it’s still going to reach capacity in the next 5 years.
“We recycle about 80% of everything that comes in here,” said Steve Joseph, vice-president of the PVT Land Co. “And we’re still going to fill up.”
Albert Shigemura, president of PVT Land Co. said if Gov. David Ige signs the buffer zone bill into law, the landfill would shut down. Ige has not said whether he plans to veto or sign the bill, and must notify lawmakers about his intention by Aug. 31.
“A half-mile buffer zone would make our operation area so small that it wouldn’t be practical,” Shigemura said. “If there’s going to be any building on the island, you need a construction landfill.”
PVT Land Co. wants to expand its operation from 160 acres to a 180-acre parcel across the street, onto land the company already owns. But the expansion plan has faced significant pushback. Some residents say the constant noise from trucks lowers property values. Others worry about potential health impacts.
But local studies haven’t singled out the PVT landfill as an environmental hazard.
In 2005 a human health risk assessment in Nanakuli concluded that there was “no significant risk to the surrounding community from disposal of contaminated soil.” Another in 2010 analyzed particulate matter and found that PVT’s recycling operations “will not pose a significant risk to the surrounding neighbors with effective dust controls.”
Signs protesting the PVT landfill are common in Nanakuli.
Claire Caulfield/Civil Beat
The following year the Department of Health commissioned another study that said while PVT was a source of dust in the area, the amount of particulate matter in the air did not exceed health-based standards. Since dust was an ongoing concern of residents the study recommended PVT and DOH take measures to reduce the amount of dust from the landfill.
In response, PVT installed large dust screens along its property line. Landfill workers spray water to reduce the amount of dust flying into the air and monitor air quality on the property.
Some residents focus their protests on the use of coal ash as filler material in the PVT landfill because coal ash from the AES power plant has been dumped in the area for decades. The EPA found people living near coal ash disposal sites have higher rates of cancer.
From 1992 to 2006 AES’s coal ash and other byproducts were taken to a quarry in Maili, where it replaced extracted rock. The state health department wasn’t able to verify how much coal ash was disposed of in the quarry and does not believe that the quarry has liners or other barriers enclosing the coal ash. The quarry was capped with a layer of soil in 2009.
DOH also wasn’t able to find testing data from groundwater under and around the quarry before 2005. One test from late 2005 showed heavy metal contamination but subsequent tests — four a year since 2006 — haven’t detected levels of contamination above health standards.
Lene Ichinotsubo, chief of the health department’s solid and hazardous waste branch, suspects the one elevated test was an error and said DOH doesn’t anticipate the coal ash posing a risk to groundwater at this time.
An AES spokeswoman said in an email that the company hasn’t violated any federal or state regulations and declined to answer questions.
The power plant is scheduled to close in 2022.
Lucy Gay, a 75-year-old Native Hawaiian activist and educator, appreciates the efforts PVT has taken to reduce the amount of dust from its site.
“They’ve been very deliberate and conscientious about addressing the issues recommended in the dust study,” she said.
Gay, a leader with the Concerned Elders of Waianae, is a hard woman to win over. In past years the group of kupuna has effectively halted the creation of a new industrial park in Nanakuli and even fought against a proposal for municipal waste to be brought to the PVT landfill.
She’s upset that some anti-landfill activists continue to cite health concerns as a reason to petition against the landfill.
“Experts came out into the community to do these dust studies but instead people cite studies from far away when we had studies right here in our neighborhood,” she said.
Nanakuli resident Jean Teo-Gibney has been protesting, writing letters, testifying and organizing against landfills in the area for years.
“Our homes were there before they were there,” she said. “This is where we live and breathe and now on the other side of the fence is trash.”
Teo-Gibney said the landfill should have never been opened in the first place because of its proximity to residential homes, especially in a low-income area.
“The working class people out here are struggling to make ends meet and put food on the table,” she said. “We’re so busy and tired that we can’t fight back or have a say in how our land is used.”
It’s the socioeconomic impact of the landfill that concerns 19-year-old Kamahoi Dillion more than anything else.
“Take a look around: they’re not real lavish houses,” he said. “No one wants to live next to a landfill.”
If Not Here, Where?
“It’s not some evil plot,” said Joseph, PVT’s vice president. “You need to put landfills on the west side because that’s where it’s driest.”
Rain increases the risk of materials in an open landfill contaminating streams, rivers, soil and beaches. The west side of every Hawaiian island receives the least amount of rainfall, and most landfills in the state are built on the leeward coasts.
Another reason the PVT landfill was approved is because it sits above brackish water. If the landfill did leak, drinking water aquifers wouldn’t be impacted.
But that argument doesn’t sway Kawika Kane, who has lived in the area for 40 years.
“There’s a million people on the island and all their trash is coming to one community. It’s not fair,” he said.
About 72% of Nanakuli residents are Native Hawaiian and the Waianae Coast has one of the highest proportions of Native Hawaiians anywhere in the world, according to census data. The PVT landfill neighbors the Princess Kahanu and Nanakuli Homesteads, where life expectancy is about 10 years lower than the state’s average.
Lauren Ballesteros-Watanabe, program manager of Oahu’s Sierra Club, said the landfill is an example of environmental racism because a community of color is bearing the negative side effects of an industry that everyone on the island benefits from.
“The location of a landfill so close to homes when many community members are so opposed is a clear failure of policy,” she said.
Even if the landfill itself isn’t affecting the health of local residents, the large trucks hauling heavy material through Nanakuli certainly are. According to the EPA, sustained exposure to vehicle emissions damages a person’s neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, reproductive and immune systems.
“I think the west side of the island did its part over the decades,” Kane said. “It’s time for other areas to do their part for our island community.”
“Are We Doomed? And Other Burning Environmental Questions” is funded in part by grants from the Environmental Funders Group of the Hawaii Community Foundation and the Frost Family Foundation.
Want to hear more? Check out Civil Beat's other podcasts.
What the heck is reef-safe sunscreen? Where does all the trash go? Why is it so hot? Join Civil Beat as we tackle your questions about Hawaii's environment. Smart. Irreverent. Never boring. This is not your grandma's science podcast.
During this unique election season, we appreciate that you and others like you have relied on Civil Beat for accurate, objective coverage of the candidates and their races.
Covering the pandemic has taken a lot of our collective energy. But through it all, our small team of reporters made sure you didn’t forget about electoral politics. Because we know that elections not only test society’s participation in our democracy, but journalism’s commitment to safeguarding it.
If you’ve relied on our election coverage this season, please consider making a tax-deductible gift to support our newsroom.