Does It Have To Be This Hard? - Honolulu Civil Beat

About the Author

Dave Young

Dave Young is a local retiree with no special credentials.

It really doesn’t have to be this hard.

Our response to the COVID-19 threat thus far has led to mass confusion, created resentments and exposed some serious institutional shortcomings.

I’ll say it again: It doesn’t have to be this hard.

Sure, in the beginning we were swimming in a void of ignorance. What were the real dangers of the virus? Who did it target and how? How could we best protect ourselves? Just where was the infection?

So, yeah, the strong initial reaction – lockdown – was probably in order. And initially, we all did really well.

But at that point, a critical order of business should have been collecting data. Learn as much as possible about the virus: how it transmits, where it’s rooted and where it’s spreading.

With solid data in hand, a coordinated response could have been crafted that protected the maximum number of people while doing the minimum amount of harm to economic and social institutions.

Aina Haina residents enjoy a game of pickleball with protective masks at Waialae Iki Park in Aina Haina, HI, Tuesday, July 15, 2020. Invented in 1965 in Washington State, pickleball can be played on a traditional tennis court with smooth paddles and a plastic hole-filled ball. (Ronen Zilberman photo Civil Beat)
Aina Haina residents enjoy a game of pickleball with protective masks at Waialae Iki Park in Aina Haina. Ronen Zilberman/Civil Beat/2020

At the same time, our leaders should have been sharing information as they got it and inviting input on creative ways to create a safe response to this outbreak.

Instead, they immediately assumed the patronizing posture of knowing what’s best for us peasants – even to the extent of spending a quarter of a million of the dollars designated for emergency response to hire a damn marketing agency to make sure we got the message.

Of course, it was way too much to ask that those dollars be used to strategically pinpoint trouble areas, then address them quickly and effectively.

Sure, if you have hard data showing the virus spreads in large groups, then limit large gatherings. Better still, if you know that most cases are happening in certain neighborhoods, then apply restrictions and educational efforts intensively to those areas.

But as soon as you cherry-pick exemptions (religious gatherings, family-based gatherings, workplace training classes), you invalidate the effort. And when you refuse to share data, your credibility is down the crapper.

If you don’t want people touching communal items or using close communal space, then restrict it. But once again, don’t fall victim to glaring hypocritical political exemptions (gyms open but restaurants closed, the ocean is open but the forest is closed, Walmart is open but Homeworld is closed, you can’t go to school but church is OK, you can buy flowers at Home Depot but not at a florist, etc.).

I’m just sayin’ that a more “surgical” approach would have been to let “life” resume but enforce a two-week shut down for any entity that is a demonstrated transmission location. So, if it appears you have a hot spot at one gym, for example, you can close that one down for a couple of weeks while you educate the patrons and clean the premises.

Would that encourage the business owner to clean the equipment better, enforce mask wearing and insist on social distancing? Theoretically, yes. Especially if the competition is allowed to stay open.

As you develop a more robust data base, you can impose surgical restrictions and target so-called hot spots without trashing the whole economy.

Of course, if you don’t have the data, you can’t have competent analysis – and if you don’t have an enforcement team, it’s all just farting in the wind. So, let’s just assume for the argument that you have good data, a core of good analysts and some muscle. I mean, you’ve got a whole lot of smart but unemployed people. Why not spend some of your federal dollars to employ them to temporarily help solve the problem?

This whole discussion is particularly relevant as the tourism market reopens.

Let’s skip the discussion on the ham-handed roll-out of testing protocols and ask the core question: What happens if infection rates skyrocket after the tourists start to fill up Waikiki and the neighborhood vacation rentals?

Do you shut down the whole tourism industry again? Or do you identify the infection hot spots and just close down those establishments?

Do you shut down all travel again, or do you identify the offending carrier and stop that route?

As you identify infected visitors, do you embrace them with warm aloha, or send them back where they came from – post-haste?

If you have the data, you can create an incredibly strong motivation for airlines, hotel hosts, restaurants and tour companies to make sure their tourists are infection-free.

Parks Closed along Waikiki Beach, covered benches along Kalakaua Avenue have yellow tape during COVID19 surge in Honolulu. August 12, 2020
Parks were closed along Waikiki Beach and benches covered earlier this summer. Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2020

How much would it gall a hotel to have to close down for deep cleaning while the competition across the street was still operating and turning good revenue? How about a tour company that had to stop operations because a bus was contaminated?

How would it feel if your bar was forced to close while the others down the street were still open?

If you have good data, good monitoring, good tracing and good analysis – and the political will to identify and enforce closure – this whole shut-everything-down (with exceptions) would not have to happen. The color code response and the tier systems would be passé.

You would not be less vigilant, but more vigilant. But instead of enforcing with a sledgehammer, you’d use a scalpel.

This surgical enforcement model can be applied to just about any institution: schools, churches, restaurants, hair salons, markets, stores, community centers, etc.

It’s not too late for our so-called leaders to stand up straight, take a deep breath and start acting like they have a clue. A couple of them are already auditioning to be the next governor. So far, nobody’s been really impressive. But that can change. Can’t it?

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Read this next:

Eric Stinton: Here's Why We Should All Mourn The Loss Of SURFER Magazine

Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.


About the Author

Dave Young

Dave Young is a local retiree with no special credentials.

Latest Comments (0)

What the author fails to mention are: 1. The State’s response was centered around hospital/ICU capacity. 2. After lockdown #1, we had done more than flatten the curve - we had almost stamped it out until they loosened restrictions and the people went crazy with large beach parties, no social distancing, so many exemptions for travelers, etc. It’s so easy to criticize and say "it’s not so hard" after watching from afar, isn’t it?

kbaybaby · 2 years ago

Right on braddah!  Timely, accurate and relevant.  The latest data shows that globally, those aged 1-70 yrs survive infection and sickness at a rate of 99.9%.  That's the WHO talking not me.  Those over age 70 fare a little worse, but usually it is due to comorbidities and not direct infection; and still survive at above a 93% rate.Why, for the life of me, are more of our akamai residents and citizens not as incensed as you and I are at the state of things w/ the state?  Apathy?  I dunno."We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus," WHO envoy Dr. David Nabarro said. "The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it." source:  Headline USA, 12 Oct 2020, "Top WHO Official: Stop ‘Using Lockdowns’ to Control COVID'  Lockdowns have just one consequence...making poor people an awful lot poorer...'"Mr mayor, Mr governor...the "emergent" part of emergency has long been over.

Ranger_MC · 2 years ago

Pretty damned good for "a local retiree with no special credentials" ! Yep, colossal failure. Simply mind-boggling. Almost anyone I know could have done better because they are practical and not ruled by giant egos.

Chillax · 2 years ago

Join the conversation


IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email to submit an idea.


You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.