Lee Cataluna: Paying The Price For Ignoring Warning Signs - Honolulu Civil Beat


About the Author

Lee Cataluna

Lee Cataluna is a columnist for Civil Beat. You can reach her by email at lcataluna@civilbeat.org


Picture this situation:

Somewhere out in the mountains in a remote part of Hawaii, a “No trespassing” sign is attached to a fence. Maybe the sign explicitly says “No hiking,” or has a graphic that shows a person with a backpack and walking stick covered by a big red circle and backslash, known as the “universal no” symbol. Perhaps there’s also a sign that says “danger” or one that says, “Warning: hazardous conditions” or “For real, brah. No even try.” 

If a person sees the warnings, shrugs and willfully presses on toward fantasies of untamed adventure only to meet up with some sort of almost inevitable trouble, should that person be responsible for the cost of their rescue?

Or should that be yet another service Hawaii provides for free to residents and visitors alike?

On the one hand, heck yeah. Send ’em the bill. If you got yourself into trouble doing something risky and illegal, why should Hawaii taxpayers have to pay for the cost of hoisting your thrill-seeking butt out of the bushes?

From the rescuers point of view, though, fire department administrators have repeatedly opposed the idea of charging for any rescues, regardless of fault or recklessness, saying that could ultimately make those who get into trouble less likely to call for help, and thus compound their peril.

The Legislature is considering a bill that would allow government entities to seek reimbursement for the cost of rescuing people who ignored posted warnings and entered prohibited areas, then needed to be saved.

Senate Bill 700 moves to the Senate Judiciary Committee for a hearing on Wednesday morning. 

It would allow any government agency to seek reimbursement for the cost of search and rescue expenses from a person, their estate, their guardians, or any entity responsible for placing the person in danger if it is determined that the person entered state, county or private property that is closed to the public and marked with a sign “giving reasonable notice of the closure.”

The bill is a work in progress and does not at this point spell out the burden of proof that must be met by the government to show the hiker knew they were in a prohibited area.

Those same reckless people who aren’t responsible for the cost of their rescue are, in fact, responsible for the cost of their medical care should they be injured as part of their ill-advised adventure. They are responsible for the cost of the ambulance that takes them from wherever the rescue helicopter lowers them down to a soccer field in a basket or where firefighters carry them out of the bushes. The cost of emergency medical care doesn’t stop them from calling for help.

Also to consider is that when adventurers get in trouble doing dangerous stuff in remote places, there have been lawsuits against the state and counties and private land owners alleging negligence for failure to provide adequate “do not” signage, failure to block access, failure to stop prior similar acts over the years by other people. The burden of responsibility is rarely on the person who took their lives into their own hands.

Hawaii’s Legislature is considering a bill that would require government entities to seek reimbursement for the cost of rescuing people who ignore posted warnings. Courtesy: Honolulu Fire Department

But if this is the moment when Hawaii stands up and takes control of the absolute insanity that came with 10 million tourists a year, then the idea of making individuals and unscrupulous adventure companies liable for the cost of getting them out of trouble is a good place to start (though it’s not just tourists who get in trouble veering off trails).

It’s hard to legislate around human nature and people’s foibles, but something to consider is whether having to pay for rescue would actually serve to deter reckless behavior and rogue hiking into prohibited areas.

The state Department of Land and Natural Resources “is in support of any strategy that will incentivize the general public to stay within authorized managed areas and already has statutory penalties for violation of laws and rules adopted specifically for going into closed areas. While these penalties are in place, absent enforcement and citations, they are clearly not a deterrent,” department chairwoman Suzanne Case said in testimony on the bill.

And that’s where we always get stuck: enforcement.

Like so many other issues in our state and so many other laws that have been shaped in the Legislature, the question of implementation and enforcement is unanswered. Will there be a new Office of Rescue Reimbursement with a cadre of lawyers? Or will it be another requirement dumped on an already overburdened civil servant with piles of files on their desk?

The neighbors who live around the Maunawili Falls Trail on Oahu have been dealing with illegal hikers and the noise of rescue helicopters for years and years. They know how this tends to go in Hawaii. There are promises and half-measures but basically the only thing that ever changes is that the situation gets worse over time.

Making intentionally reckless hikers pay for the consequences of their actions makes perfect sense until you get to the part about exactly how that’s going to work.

Passing a new law that doesn’t have the enforcement part of it all worked out is like stepping off the beaten path into the overgrown tangle of bureaucratic nothingness.


Read this next:

FDR Responded To The Desperation Of His Time


Before you go…

During a crisis like this, it’s more important than ever to dig beyond the news, to figure out what government policies mean for ordinary citizens and how those policies were put together.

This is perhaps the biggest, most consequential story our reporters will ever cover. And at no other time in Civil Beat’s history have we relied on your support more. Please consider supporting Civil Beat by making a tax-deductible gift.

Contribute

About the Author

Lee Cataluna

Lee Cataluna is a columnist for Civil Beat. You can reach her by email at lcataluna@civilbeat.org


Latest Comments (0)

As an experienced hiker I have mixed feelings about this proposed legislation. As See_jane said there are very few hikes on Oahu that are officially sanctioned. Many of the nicest trails are in officially off limits areas. Not to mention the fact that the military is occupying major portions of prime land here. Citizens have a right to ocean access so why don’t we have a right to mountain access? Mountains are also part of the "commons" . As Keala Kanai said charging people will incentivize them to delay calling for help, and that’s immoral. Moreover, don’t forget that even the most experienced person can just have bad luck. Not everyone who gets into trouble in the mountains is an idiot (Google Ueli Steck). What we really need is more education and better information on the objective danger of any particular hike. Since no one else has done it, I am developing a standard grading system for hikes in Hawaii so that people can assess risk relative to conditions and their experience level BEFORE they go out.

paulo · 1 month ago

Talked to a few of these naive visitors. They all said they were told it was alright and you just had to pass a certain point! S old stuff all the time

Richard · 1 month ago

Solution:As a tourist gets off an airplane or cruise ship they have to sign a legal promissory note that why will pay all monetary obligations to their potential rescue due to an unforeseen accident. Those who refuse to sign the contract will then have to post a $5,000-10,000 bond to be allowed entrance into the islands.And while we're at it, a tourist will also have to sign a contract that they will spend an X amount of money per day during their visit. I'm sure our legislators will make the daily fee a high amount, thereby insuring a higher class of tourists, who statistically are less accident prone.

Joseppi · 1 month ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.