Navy Should Make Jet Fuel, Not Store It At Red Hill - Honolulu Civil Beat

To ensure our nonprofit newsroom has the resources next year to continue our impactful reporting, we need to welcome 700 new donors and raise $225,000 by December 31.

We have raised $96,000 from 1,540 donors, including 210 new donors. Mahalo!

Donate

To ensure our nonprofit newsroom has the resources next year to continue our impactful reporting, we need to welcome 700 new donors and raise $225,000 by December 31.

We have raised $96,000 from 1,540 donors, including 210 new donors. Mahalo!

Donate


About the Author

Richard Tillotson

Richard Tillotson is a novelist, playwright, and former advertising executive who worked on many of Hawaii’s largest accounts. His latest book is “What You Will On Capitol Hill.”


“The Air Force Partners With Twelve, Proves It’s Possible To Make Jet Fuel Out Of Thin Air.”

Opinion article badge

That’s the headline in an article published last month on the U.S. Air Force government website. This news presents the Navy with an option: Rather than ship jet fuel across the Pacific and store it at Red Hill, they can make their own, right here in Hawaii, using only water, air and sunlight.

The idea may sound like science fiction, but many serious people — including the Air Force — are investigating similar opportunities all around the planet.

The inconvenient facts about Red Hill are that jet fuel is critical to the Navy’s mission, and Hawaii is thousands of miles from the nearest oil well. Storing 750 million gallons of highly toxic fuel a hundred feet above Oahu’s major aquifer from which hundreds of thousands of people derive their drinking water seems like a dumb idea.

But without jet fuel, all those Raptors, Hornets, and other lethal jet fighters stationed here are just useless hunks of metal.

That is why the Red Hill storage facility was constructed during World War II. If Japanese submarines had cut off the fuel tankers supplying Pearl Harbor, the aircraft carriers stationed there were as good as sunk. Potential enemies in the Pacific have changed, but the strategic situation has not.

A tank at Red Hill, where concerns have been raised for years about leaks into an aquifer. Courtesy of U.S. Navy

Something has changed, however, in the ways jet fuel can be created.

Writing in support of House Bill 683 last March, (“Sustainable Air Travel Bill Could be a Game Changer”), I reported how scientists at Oxford University in England have developed a method of creating jet fuel using CO2 from the atmosphere, hydrogen from water, and renewable energy from wind or solar. HB 683 passed both houses of the legislature and Governor Ige signed it into law.

Last month, Civil Beat reported on a global nonprofit that awarded a grant to another startup with a pilot project in Arizona. They, too, are developing an “air, plus water plus sunshine equals jet fuel” process similar to Oxford’s.

And last month, the United States Air Force announced a partnership with another startup company called Twelve.

The Air Force article states that Twelve’s “carbon transformation platform” promises to “untether aviation from petroleum supply chains.”

Money And Land

Like the other startups, Twelve uses CO2, hydrogen from water, and electricity to create carbon-neutral jet fuel. The article goes on to point out that mitigating carbon emissions is a Department of Defense key priority under Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. The Pentagon has long identified climate change as a significant national security threat.

Water, air, and sunshine are not hard to find in Hawaii. Money and land are. The most significant costs for these innovative jet fuel technologies appear to be the capital investments required for research and infrastructure as well as the land where solar panels can be located.

No public or private entity in Hawaii is better equipped with money and land than the Defense Department. Defense has an annual budget of $750 billion, and the military controls more than 80,000 acres of land on Oahu.

Jet fuel combustion is the largest single source of Hawaii’s carbon emissions.

The Defense Department also has a long history of developing once-startling “science fiction” technologies that are now part of our daily life. The Internet, GPS mapping, and communication satellites that enable our cell phones are a few examples.

Jet fuel combustion is the largest single source of Hawaii’s carbon emissions, producing more than either automobiles or electric power generation. The Navy could lead the way in showing how water, air and sunshine can create carbon-neutral jet fuel for all of us.

This new technology wouldn’t eliminate the need for jet fuel storage capacity on Oahu, but it would lessen the need for much of it and for keeping it in its present location.

A technology that has already received official endorsement from the Air Force and would allow the Navy to better fulfill its military role as well as its climate change mission seems a far preferable option than continuing to store toxic fuel over our drinking water, no matter how “safe” the storage tanks are claimed to be.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Lee Cataluna: Let's Hit Pause Instead Of Charging Forward Amid The Pandemic


Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.

Contribute

About the Author

Richard Tillotson

Richard Tillotson is a novelist, playwright, and former advertising executive who worked on many of Hawaii’s largest accounts. His latest book is “What You Will On Capitol Hill.”


Latest Comments (0)

The two refineries on Oahu make nothing but varieties of jet fuel for civilian and military use. Gasoline and additional diesel is shipped in and stored on Oahu and the neighbor islands. Navy ships run on turbines which use a variety of jet fuel. Civilian and Air Force planes use JP-4 jet fuel while Navy planes use JP-5 jet fuel. The two refineries on Oahu have a limited capacity, which is why additional diesel and gasoline is shipped in to Hawaii. An additional refinery exclusively for the Military is impractical due to limited land use capacity and security concerns.

WildJim · 1 week ago

There is no easy solution for the use of underground storage tanks for the military.  No way can a fuel production facility can be sized for the immediate delivery of fuel for the fleet and it's aircraft.  Imagine the vast quantity of fuel required during RIMPAC.  Storage capacity would still be required when there is a surge in demand.  An analogy is the drinking water from BWS.  The wells couldn't possibly meet surge demand so reservoirs are required.Another concern would be the hardening of the production facility in case of attack.  The facility would have to be built into the mountain side resulting in the same problem of fuel leaking into the groundwater.

gonefishing · 1 week ago

The ability to make synthetic hydrocarbon fuels (jet fuel, diesel, gasoline) from atmospheric CO2, water and excess solar- or wind-generated electricity is a highly welcome development in our quest to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. Synthetic liquid hydrocarbons also offer a far more sustainable and scalable option for long-term storage of excess renewable energy than batteries, pumped hydro, or hydrogen gas. Current cost of such synthetic fuels is around $15-$20 per gallon but it is hoped that the cost will drop to $5 per gallon as technologies are refined and scaled up.The question is, can the sprawling solar-power and CO2-capture infrastructure required by this technology be relied upon in case of war?

Chiquita · 1 week ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.