Carbon Cashback: Good For The Planet And The Pocketbook - Honolulu Civil Beat


About the Author

Noel Morin

Noel Morin is a leader with the Citizens’ Climate Lobby, a grassroots organization dedicated to effective climate policy. Visit cclhawaii.org for more information.


Hawaii’s leaders are moving along one of the most consequential climate policies considered by our Legislature — a carbon fee and refundable tax credit.

Opinion article badge

The measure, House Bill 2278, promises to create an environment that will accelerate our transition away from fossil fuels, contributing to much-needed emissions reductions while protecting our low-to-moderate income households. It does this by putting a predictable increasing price on carbon pollution.

This will increase the cost of fossil fuels and incentivize reducing their utilization — much as a tax on cigarettes reduced consumption. Furthermore, HB 2278 mandates that the tax revenue be returned to residents to offset the expected increase in prices. This allows the tax to be progressive — it does not grow government but will enable residents, especially those in low-to-moderate income households, to benefit.

HB 2278 has garnered significant support from many during its committee hearings in the House. This acknowledges its effectiveness in reducing emissions and allowing for an equitable transition to a lower carbon reality. It is now facing a House vote before crossing over to the Senate.

HB 2278 is effective because it adopts a carbon fee and dividend model, much as was described in a UHERO study and recently recommended by the Hawaii Tax Review Commission.

The UHERO study was commissioned to understand the impact of carbon pricing on low-to-moderate income households. It concluded that it is possible to cut emissions to 40% below 2019 levels with a carbon tax.

Further, the policy would benefit low-to-moderate income households if revenues were returned to residents.

Does It Work?

Questions have been raised about the efficacy of the strategy. One need only look at the global stage to realize that many governments have implemented carbon pricing. There are currently close to 30 countries with one. The U.S. and Australia are among the countries with developed economies that don’t have a carbon tax.

Sweden implemented a carbon tax in 1991 and has the highest price globally at $137 per ton. It reduced its emissions by 25% by 2000. At the same time, its economy grew by 60%.

British Columbia implemented its carbon tax in 2008, which is currently at $45 per ton. Studies have shown that it had a minimal impact on the economy while reducing emissions between 5% and 15%.

Carbon pricing will encourage investment and innovation in clean energy solutions. The European Union’s carbon price has been cited as one of the main reasons electric vehicle penetration in Europe far exceeds that of the U.S. Furthermore, Metcalf and Stock find that the EU’s carbon price has a very negligible impact on its overall economy.

Carbon Pricing Is Popular, Will Benefit All

Placing a price on carbon pollution has been endorsed by thousands of economists, former chairs of the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable, prominent religious groups, Pope Francis, and many prominent individuals and businesses.

A gradually rising price on carbon pollution, as proposed in HB 2278, offers flexibility in the response. Carbon pricing can maximize resources by implementing energy efficiency measures, deploying renewables and cutting fuel consumption. While added costs can be passed on to consumers, they can come out ahead by reducing their energy and fuel consumption.

GRAPHIC How would a carbon tax work in Hawaii?
How would a carbon tax work in Hawaii? UHERO

With HB 2278, consumers can adjust to gradually increasing costs, and with the refundable tax credit, they will be better able to accommodate the price increases. Additionally, they can save even more by adopting energy efficiency measures — conserving electricity, driving more efficient cars and making homes more efficient. This will allow more of their refundable tax credit to be spent on other necessities.

Notably, a market shift away from fossil fuels will increase investment in and adoption of renewable energy and clean transportation. This will ultimately result in lower energy costs (renewables are cheaper than fossil fuel-based electricity) and lower transportation costs (electric cars are more affordable to fuel and maintain).

Global Pressure Is Growing

The EU and Canada have announced plans to implement carbon border adjustments — tariffs on high carbon product imports from countries without a similar carbon tax. This border tax allows importing countries to level the playing field for their businesses.

It has the effect of encouraging countries to implement a price on carbon. While members of Congress have discussed U.S. carbon border taxes, they cannot implement one effectively without a domestic carbon tax.

There are carbon pricing bills in the current Congress and support for including a carbon price in the Budget Reconciliation. Notably, developments in the U.S. Supreme Court highlight how regulations are fraught with the risk of political threats. (They are also complex, costly and often regressive.)

The Climate Emergency Is Here

The climate crisis is our existential threat. The latest IPCC report reiterates the need for urgent climate action and confirms the consequences of inaction.

“The world faces unavoidable multiple climate hazards over the next two decades with global warming of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degree Fahrenheit). Even temporarily exceeding this warming level will result in additional severe impacts, some of which will be irreversible. Risks for society will increase, including to infrastructure and low-lying coastal settlements.”

We cannot afford to sit back and hope that the rest of the globe will solve global warming. While our emissions are a fraction of the globe’s, we contribute to the ever-increasing atmospheric CO2 (recently at 420 PPM). As global citizens, we have a responsibility to act and do our share to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Importantly, we have an opportunity to not only reduce our fossil fuel dependence and our global-warming emissions, but we can influence the rest of the nation to do the same. If the most petroleum-dependent state in the nation with a strong reliance on fossil fuel imports from countries like Libya and Russia can price carbon, others will follow.

We need carbon cashback. We must pass HB 2278.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Sterling Higa: The Promise And Peril Of Remote Work


Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.

Contribute

About the Author

Noel Morin

Noel Morin is a leader with the Citizens’ Climate Lobby, a grassroots organization dedicated to effective climate policy. Visit cclhawaii.org for more information.


Latest Comments (0)

This is the kind of policy that needs to be implemented on a national basis not just Hawaii.Missing from this article are concrete cost examples like how much tax will this add to a gallon of gasoline, how much will this increase the cost of electricity, in year 1 and then year 2 etc..There is a segment of the population that is not required to file tax returns and there are the illegals amongst us that don't file either. Sounds like this will increase the number who must file returns. Those who don't file because of their immigration status will have to bear the cost.If Hawaii enacts this legislation, it will effectively have 0 effect on sea level rise. Hawaii's carbon emissions don't even come close to a drop in the global bucket of carbon emissions. Unless China and India are onboard, this law would merely serve as virtue signaling campaign fodder for our politicians.Meanwhile our economy will remain dependent on jet transport and the military, 2 of the biggest carbon spewers. My off the cuff hunch is that a high jet fuel tax would be far simpler and maybe more effective than this proposal and it might perhaps reduce inbound tourism as well.

Thrasybulus_of_Athens · 10 months ago

The high (and rapidly rising) prices of lithium batteries and electricity place all-electric cars far outside the reach of working-class and middle-class households. If I had to replace my car today, my budget would be $10k at the very most, far too little to buy an electric car. Even if someone gave one to me for free, I would have nowhere to charge it.This makes carbon tax a regressive one: it would take money from the working and middle classes to pay for fashionable status symbols for the rich.

Chiquita · 11 months ago

We definitely need to replace buying Russian oil with buying China lithium?

Whatarewedoing · 11 months ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.