Remembering Big Wind’s Big Fail On Lanai - Honolulu Civil Beat

Over the next three days, the Sidney Stern Memorial Trust is pledging to match your new monthly donation 12 times or double your one-time gift, all up to $13,000!

We've raised $53,000 toward our year-end goal!

Donate

More than 1092 donors have already made gifts during our year-end campaign!

Over the next three days, the Sidney Stern Memorial Trust is pledging to match your new monthly donation 12 times or double your one-time gift, all up to $13,000!

We've raised $53,000 toward our year-end goal!

Donate

More than 1092 donors have already made gifts during our year-end campaign!


About the Author

Robin Kaye

Robin Kaye is a longtime Lanai resident and energy activist and chairman of the Friends of Lanai. He is the author of Lanai Folks.

Kirstin Downey’s recent article (“The Struggle Over Towering Wind Farms Is At The Center Of A Honolulu City Council Debate,” Sept. 21) rightly highlights the Kahuku community’s critical role in helping to inform public opinion regarding the negative community impacts of industrial wind power plants.

Opinion article badge

She writes: “When they first arrived in Hawaii about a decade ago, the turbines were initially welcomed but North Shore residents were shocked by their huge size and disturbed to learn they posed deadly hazards for endangered wildlife, particularly the opeapea bat on the North Shore. But opposition hardened when the big towers came to Kahuku three years ago.”

While that’s accurate (although the first wind turbines arrived on the Big Island’s South Point in 1987), it overlooks the role of the Lanai community’s opposition to the now defunct Big Wind proposals for Lanai and Molokai in Hawaii’s love/hate affair with industrial wind power plants.

First proposed in 2007 — 15 years ago — Big Wind on Lanai was David Murdock’s and then-Gov. Linda Lingle’s scheme to install 170 wind turbines that would irretrievably alter — and environmentally destroy — almost 25% of Lanai’s land. The giant turbines would generate electricity to be delivered via an undersea cable to power Oahu’s ever-increasing demand for electricity.

Scale “model” of what one of Lanai’s proposed wind turbines would look like at the Hawaii State Capitol.
Illustration of what one of Lanai’s proposed wind turbines would look like at the Hawaii State Capitol. Courtesy: Friends of Lanai

The project divided this small island of 3,000 people in ways that are still being felt today. It was touted as a panacea for those hungry to achieve the state’s goal of 100% renewable energy. But to many Lanaians, it was seen as an environmentally destructive scheme designed primarily to enrich the landowner.

The community’s consistent and vocal opposition — despite the project’s support from many legislators, two governors, an abundance of state bureaucrats, Hawaiian Electric, the ILWU and others — eventually killed the project. The unwillingness of Lanai’s new and current majority landowner to support the destruction of “his” island, put the final nail in the coffin of Big Wind on Lanai.

Several community members from Kahuku came to Lanai years ago, and asked Friends of Lanai, the group formed to lead the opposition to Big Wind, for advice during this divisive time. We told them to “just say no,” rather than trying to set restrictions and/or conditions on the placement of wind turbines in their neighborhood.

They did not follow that recommendation, and I wonder what those members, looking back, think now.

Time passes, and many have forgotten — or never knew — the lessons learned from the Big Wind struggle. With time, Kahuku’s lessons will likely fade as well. There will be new administrations, and new profit-seeking corporations wanting to capitalize on resources in small communities.

The message for me is that the community needs to be involved early and frequently if it’s targeted to be the site of industrial power plants, of any flavor, and it has to “just say no” frequently, continuously and loudly. Never give up or give in.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Neal Milner: The Key To Upward Mobility? Well-Off Friends


Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.

Contribute

About the Author

Robin Kaye

Robin Kaye is a longtime Lanai resident and energy activist and chairman of the Friends of Lanai. He is the author of Lanai Folks.


Latest Comments (0)

Does the opposition to wind farms have an alternative proposal for green energy? Options would be hydropower, solar, ocean wave, atomic fusion, others?

MICHAEL2042 · 1 month ago

I completely agree that wind turbines are not an appropriate technology for anywhere in Hawaii, onshore or offshore, for multiple reasons including: (1) a questionable net energy gain over the long term considering manufacturing, installation, maintenance and replacements, (2) aesthetic destruction of our homeland and near-shore areas, and (3) myriad biological negative impacts. But this viewpoint does not directly present any clear reasons for opposition other than being an industrial use. It just bases opposition on "environmental" impacts. I don't think this will broaden public opposition much to this initiative by "windmillers." I live in Kona, on the Big Island, and I truly dread having more of these ugly "bird-beaters" popping up in Kohala and Ka'u districts where the wind is. The State should instead press the geothermal development option for non-fossil fuel energy generation; a highly credible study shows viable geothermal production capacity on Oahu and Maui as well as multiple spots on the west side of Hawaii island. Sacred cow vs. desecration? An ironic tragedy if allowed to continue in this direction of "wind farms" sitting on top of geothermal energy sources. LOL

Colin12345 · 2 months ago

Has the wind farm at Ma'alaea on Maui avoided most of these issues? I know they have issues with killing bats, but I haven't heard about community objections like on Lana'i or in Kahuku.

Rob · 2 months ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.