Eric Stinton: We Should Collaborate On A Plan For Public Education In Hawaii - Honolulu Civil Beat

Over the next three days, the Sidney Stern Memorial Trust is pledging to match your new monthly donation 12 times or double your one-time gift, all up to $13,000!

We've raised $53,000 toward our year-end goal!

Donate

More than 1092 donors have already made gifts during our year-end campaign!

Over the next three days, the Sidney Stern Memorial Trust is pledging to match your new monthly donation 12 times or double your one-time gift, all up to $13,000!

We've raised $53,000 toward our year-end goal!

Donate

More than 1092 donors have already made gifts during our year-end campaign!


About the Author

Eric Stinton

Eric Stinton is a writer and teacher from Kailua, where he lives with his wife and dogs. You can reach him on Twitter at @TombstoneStint and find his work at ericstinton.com.

Parents want to be more involved with the education system. That should be good news – in my experience, it’s difficult to get parents involved with their own kids’ homework, let alone participate in the macro-level planning of the Department of Education machine. But something about Civil Beat’s recent story gave me an uneasy feeling.

Opinion article badge

It’s a good overview that covers several angles of legitimate frustration. Schools feel overburdened and understaffed, under increasing pressure from all sides to do more work with less time. Parents are upset that communication from the DOE and Board of Education is inconsistent, needlessly difficult and unintelligibly hole-punched with acronyms. They feel left out of important decisions that directly impact their children, during one of the most precarious moments in modern American life. It’s easy to sympathize with them.

But a few things felt off. Although several parents and education groups were interviewed in it, not a single person communicated anything specific they wanted to change, just that parents “want more of a voice” in the creation of a statewide education plan. But what does that mean exactly?

Does “more of a voice” mean greater influence in how funds are appropriated by the Legislature, or how they’re spent at the state, district or school levels? Does it mean greater control over what’s taught and how it’s taught? Are they talking about changing break or bell schedules, how to address vaping, cyber-bullying or chronic absenteeism, which interventions are most effective for students performing below grade level standards?

You might say the answer to all of those questions is “yes.” Some would have more to say about one topic than another, but in general parents should be involved in all of those decisions. The problem is, frankly, that a lot of parents are completely unfamiliar with on-the-ground realities at schools, and thus lack the expertise to meaningfully weigh in on these matters.

Although the comment section on Civil Beat is genuinely more thoughtful than most websites I’ve contributed to, it’s easy to sift through the comments on virtually any education article and find people proposing bad ideas that have been thoroughly debunked by research as simple, quick-fix solutions.

A commenter on the article earlier this month responded to the report of low test scores by saying “Start holding back students. It shouldn’t be an option anymore.” This idea resonates with a lot of people, but in reality, holding a student back drastically increases the likelihood of them dropping out of school altogether. It’s been observed over and over and over.

DOE Department of Education building.
Parents say they want more of a voice in the public education system. But what specifically does that mean? Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2022

On a recent column I wrote about some of the innovative things happening in public schools across the state, many of the responses echoed a similar sentiment: it sounds fun that teachers are making lessons more engaging, but why not just focus on the traditional “three Rs” of education: reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic?

What they don’t understand – and, in fairness, what I failed to adequately communicate – is studies show that weaving those skills into engaging lessons improves learning outcomes, because students are interacting with ideas on a deeper level than they do during drill-and-kill exercises.

Most parents know little about current research on education policy or best practices in the classroom. And why would they? They have families to take care of, jobs to go to (often more than one), and other responsibilities to take care of. They don’t have the time or the reason to look into teaching via the jigsaw method, or Socratic seminars, or reciprocal teaching, or any number of proven methods they never experienced personally.

Worse yet, much of the movement for “parent’s rights,” both locally and nationally, is a hotbed of bizarre conspiracies repeated from hyper-partisan cable news, an entertainment product (as opposed to an educational service) designed to get viewers riled up.

I follow some of these local “parent’s rights advocacy groups,” and for the most part they believe schools are indoctrinating kids with a “woke” agenda instead of teaching them the basics, all because the school library offers books with gay characters in them or promotes Black authors during Black History Month.

These groups regularly call teachers groomers and child abusers as a default truth that teachers have to somehow disprove. They’re disinterested in working with schools to address real problems, opting instead to focus on imaginary ones where the only solution is a complete pivot away from public education.

It’s brain worm stuff that is completely discordant with reality; they’d know this if they spent half the time they usually waste watching TV and trawling Facebook by reading books with their kids, helping them with their homework or volunteering at their local school. They don’t want “more of a voice;” they simply want to bark orders and get their way without doing any of the hard, messy work of learning and collaborating.

Parents need to approach their involvement with humility to understand the limits of their perspectives, willingness to accept new information, and commitment to actively reinforce learning at home.

What troubles me most is that all of this stemmed from low test scores, which means not only are we still acting shocked that a global pandemic had some negative impacts on learning (or at least learning that can be easily measured by standardized tests), we are also still blaming schools for broader social problems beyond their control.

This is a fundamental error of analysis that prevents us from being able to talk about education reform accurately, and if we don’t even know how to talk about improving schools, we won’t be effective at actually improving them.

BOE member Makana McClellan rightly noted the performance gap on standardized tests and low rates of college attendance for Native Hawaiians as big problems. The questions to ask, then, are what are the causes of these problems, and does an education plan address those causes?

If you place demographic data for poverty, homelessness and standardized test scores side-by-side, you’ll see a lot of similarities between them. Which do you think impacts a student more: lack of a strategic education plan, or prolonged periods of hunger and not having a safe, reliable place to sleep?

Instead of looking at the confluence of large-scale forces that affect kids in and out of school, we’re only looking at the effects visible during the school day and attributing them to the school because that’s where we see them. It’s a facile interaction with reality.

Standardized tests are useful for identifying where problems exist, but they are not useful for identifying why those problems exist. We should collaborate on a plan for public education, but if we’re expecting it to solve things like poverty and homelessness and trauma, then it doesn’t matter how much of a voice parents have in its creation. The solution does not address the causes.

None of this is to say parents should be left in the dark. Far from it: we need to create a space for parents and school staff to meet regularly, to listen to each other and work together, to go over data and interpret it into something actionable. The community should be involved with school policies, as well as decisions about how to spend school funds.

The DOE, BOE and individual schools need to have clear, consistent communication about what’s being done, and honest reflections on its results. We need to respect parental input and welcome it as an integral part of the education landscape, because that’s what it is.

Parents need to approach their involvement with humility to understand the limits of their perspectives, willingness to accept new information, and commitment to actively reinforce learning at home.

Communication, honesty, respect, humility – notice how critical and necessary these things are, and how none of them can be measured in standardized tests?

Parents should have more of a voice in education. But if they truly want to make their voice count, what they really need is more of a presence.

Civil Beat’s education reporting is supported by a grant from Chamberlin Family Philanthropy.


Read this next:

Lessons Learned 40 Years Ago From Hurricane Iwa


Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.

Contribute

About the Author

Eric Stinton

Eric Stinton is a writer and teacher from Kailua, where he lives with his wife and dogs. You can reach him on Twitter at @TombstoneStint and find his work at ericstinton.com.


Latest Comments (0)

You make some very valid points and I do agree that parents need to be actively involved with the kids, schools and parents. On point. What I do not agree with is what the legislature tried to do last session (thank God it failed) is to bring in social issues such as LGBTQ and the like. Not the job of the state to be teaching these issues to our K-12. We need to take a serious look and decentralize the DOE and BOE and break up the largest department and union power in the state. If we are truly interested in our kids development for the future and to be competitive. This needs to happen. Will the union and money going to politicians allow it. We know the answer.

Stopthemadness · 1 week ago

I have 2 kids in public school right now, and it is incredibly frustrating that a lot of these people who "want a voice" are school failures by their own right and many BARELY involved with their kid's educations right now. I do NOT want them involved with my kids education. It's easy for people to be loud and persistent AND wrong. I may not agree with all the decision by DOE and schools, but I respect the fact that I am NOT the expert in this area and make decisions with that in mind. Some humility and trust needs to be given to our educators. Schools do not need micromanagement from unqualified parents.While I respect everyone should have a voice, we cannot destroy our system because some people fail to see their own deficiencies. I understand diversity and differences in perspectives are important, and I feel like my kids' opportunities to learn are being affected by these people who are newly and suddenly involved.If you disagree with something, teach your kids why you disagree with something and explain to them. That's life. Banning books, subjects, etc. is idiocy. Especially in USA which is supposed to be the shining beacon of freedom.

Aim4AlohaIntegrity · 1 week ago

Great article, and I appreciate the innovative ideas. It is certainly a huge problem.I follow some of these local "parent’s rights advocacy groups," and for the most part they believe schools are indoctrinating kids with a "woke" agenda instead of teaching them the basics, all because the school library offers books with gay characters in them or promotes Black authors during Black History Month.Uhh, I believe only one party is doing those things. It is quite unfortunate, that they believe so many conspiracy theories, and follow various wormholes, so that they become a party of grievance. Hopefully that will change in the not too distant future.

Scotty_Poppins · 1 week ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.