Just $1,025 remaining of our $10,000 match! Give now and DOUBLE your support for local, independent news. 

Join over 40 new donors who have made a gift to Civil Beat so far!

Double my donation

Just $1,025 remaining of our $10,000 match! Give now and DOUBLE your support for local, independent news. 

Join over 40 new donors who have made a gift to Civil Beat so far!

Double my donation

Courtesy

About the Author

Steven Businger

Steven Businger is a professor at the Atmospheric Sciences Department in SOEST, University of Hawaiʻi Mānoa.


Breaking up NCAR would dramatically hurt U.S. science capability and undermine predicting the weather.

Foolish and counterproductive are two words that come to mind regarding the Trump administration’s plan to break up the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.

NCAR is the crown jewel of atmospheric research in the nation, with an unparalleled global reputation.

Its research covers an immense scientific range, including the development of new weather and climate models, essential research into atmospheric processes, technological innovations to deal with weather threats (such as aircraft turbulence and severe weather), and the use of supercomputers for environmental research and prediction, to name only a few.

Scientists at the American Geophysical Union meeting earlier this month in New Orleans stood to indicate that their careers have benefited from NCAR’s science, data and services. (Nam Thai)

Improvements in weather forecasting, which we all take for granted today, are the result of the scientific breakthroughs in numerical weather prediction fostered by National Center for Atmospheric Research.

NCAR is a primary site for disciplinary meetings and has played an important role in training generation after generation of future atmospheric students. I did a cooperative M.S. degree at NCAR and the University of Colorado, which started my career.

Thus, it is more than disturbing when the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russel Vought, put out a message stating the NCAR would be broken up due to its “climate alarmism.”

(Screenshot/2025)

Breaking up NCAR would dramatically hurt U.S. science capability and profoundly undermine the ability of the U.S. to predict both weather and climate, including in the Central North Pacific.

This in turn would put Americans, including us here in Hawaiʻi at increased risk to severe weather, costing both lives and property.

Yes, there are a few NCAR scientists who have been vocal regarding climate change, but that is certainly their right as American citizens. Their statements do not represent the organization, which is based on scientific excellence.

I hope that this counterproductive and profoundly damaging plan is shelved.

U.S. weather prediction capabilities do need to be improved. Doing so requires
a strengthening of NCAR and building a joint effort with NOAA that would create the best weather simulation and forecasting capabilities in the world.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Neal Milner: 'Limbo Field' Would Reflect The Precarious State Of UH Football


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Steven Businger

Steven Businger is a professor at the Atmospheric Sciences Department in SOEST, University of Hawaiʻi Mānoa.


Latest Comments (0)

"Foolish and counterproductive are two words that come to mind regarding the Trump administration’s plan to break up the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado."Stopping science is foolish and unproductive when it's the Trump administration but not when it's the Mauna Kea "protectors?"The hypocrisy would be comedic if it wasn't so sad.

gordo · 4 months ago

Obviously they have been vocal. Our once great nation continues to be undermined by the anti-science Trump Regime now readying to dismantle the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Though it is/was the world's leading Earth Science Research Institution, does not matter to those wishing to destroy active knowledge gathering. The agenda: To remove roadblocks to more polluting, climate affecting fossil fuel development, along with reduced critical weather forecasting. Why? So large amounts of money can be made for a few, with less push back. No one wants this but the special interest influencers of DJT.

Valerie · 4 months ago

"Trump administration’s plan to break up the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado"It is disturbing that there are those close to the Trump administration that are more interested in the weather on Mars than earth's changing weather.It would not be surprising to learn that a part of this "break up" entails selling the NCAR building in Boulder and turning it into a big beautiful Trump hotel.

Joseppi · 4 months ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

Ideas is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaiʻi. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaiʻi, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Stay updated with the latest news from Maui.
  • What's this? Weekly coverage of Hawaiʻi Island news and community.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.