Hawaiʻi talks a lot about supporting small farmers. We talk about food security. About resilience. About reducing our dependence on imports.

But for years, one of the most basic barriers facing small producers had nothing to do with land, water or labor.

It was paperwork — not because farmers couldn’t do it, but because the system assumed they had time, staff and language access that many simply don’t.

Food safety certification is a perfect example.

A Special Commentary Project

Civil Beat is focusing on transparency, accountability and ethics in government and other institutions. Help us by sending ideas and anecdotes to sunshine@civilbeat.org.

Read More

For large farms, it’s a cost of doing business. For small farms, it’s often a locked door.

That door matters. Without certification, growers are cut off from schools, distributors and institutional buyers — no matter how good their produce is, no matter how long they’ve been farming.

What’s changed quietly over the last few years is not the standard, but the structure.

And the redesign didn’t come from a new regulation. It came from listening.

Before GroupGAP

Traditional food safety certification requires each farm to build and manage its own system: written plans, logs, audits, unannounced inspections, corrective actions. It’s time-intensive, expensive and unforgiving.

For a small operation — especially one run by a family, by first-generation farmers, or by growers working in a second language — that burden can be overwhelming.

The result wasn’t bad farming. It was exclusion.

Not by intent. By design.

As Lisa Rhoden, executive director of the North Shore Economic Vitality Partnership, put it during our conversation: farmers know how to farm. What they don’t have is time to decipher constantly changing rules, write formal safety plans and manage compliance on top of growing food.

For years, many simply opted out — not because they wanted to, but because the path wasn’t realistic.

In practice, the paperwork didn’t fail small farmers. It was written for operations that looked nothing like theirs.

What GroupGAP Actually Does

GroupGAP — short for Group Good Agricultural Practices — flips the model.

Instead of each farm navigating certification alone, a central organization manages a shared quality management system. Farmers still undergo audits. Standards don’t change. Accountability doesn’t disappear.

What changes is who carries the load.

In Hawaiʻi, that role is filled by the North Shore Economic Vitality Partnership, which launched the state’s first — and still only — USDA-recognized GroupGAP program for diversified fruits and vegetables in 2019, after nearly two years of development and review.

Since then, Hawaiʻi GroupGAP has trained 11 cohorts and supported more than 50 farms across the islands — representing roughly 40% of the state’s small farms certified under harmonized food safety standards.

The outcome isn’t abstract.

For participating farms, certification often unlocks access to buyers they were previously barred from — schools, wholesalers and distributors. Even limited wholesale access can mean an additional $10,000 to $15,000 a year for a small operation — not by growing more food, but by finally being allowed to sell what they already grow.

That difference isn’t growth theater. It’s survival.

The App That Changed Everything

Early on, the program hit a wall.

Paper records didn’t scale. Farmers forgot logs. Binders piled up. Staff time vanished into follow-ups and filing.

The solution wasn’t more enforcement. It was translation — technological and literal.

Hawaiʻi GroupGAP adopted a USDA-accepted mobile record-keeping platform that allows farmers to log required food safety data directly from the field, on a phone or tablet. Records are customized to each operation. Entries are guided. Nothing requires an office.

For farmers, documentation moved out of the back room and into the workday.

For the program itself, it meant scale — hundreds of thousands of individual food safety records tracked digitally across islands, crops and languages without burying farmers in binders or staff in spreadsheets.

Just as importantly, the platform enabled translation into Thai and Mandarin, paired with interpreter support — a breakthrough for immigrant farmers who had long been locked out of certification not by practice, but by language.

The first Mandarin-speaking farmers have already completed certification through the program. Thai-speaking farmers are currently working toward it — not because standards were lowered, but because access finally exists.

Why This Worked In Hawaiʻi

None of this happened by accident.

North Shore EVP itself grew out of a community effort to protect agricultural land from constant development pressure. The idea was simple: If farming could be made economically viable, open land would stay open.

When early conversations with distributors revealed that food safety certification was a prerequisite for aggregation and wholesale access, GroupGAP became the logical first step.

What followed was slow, unglamorous work: writing quality manuals, passing USDA audits, running pilot cohorts, adjusting delivery, and — critically — meeting farmers where they were instead of where policy assumed they should be.

By the time the pandemic exposed just how fragile Hawaiʻi’s food system had become, the structure was already in place.

Interest surged. Participation followed.

Today, farms from every major island — including Molokaʻi and Lānaʻi — participate in the program through a mix of remote training and targeted on-farm support. 

What This Doesn’t Solve — and What It Risks

None of this is without tradeoffs.

GroupGAP doesn’t solve land access. It doesn’t solve water costs. It doesn’t solve housing or labor shortages. And it doesn’t pretend to.

It also raises real design questions.

Hawai‘i Grown

This ongoing series delves deep into what it would take for Hawai‘i to decrease its dependence on imported food and be better positioned to grow its own.

Read More

A shared system means shared risk: If internal oversight slips, one farm’s mistake can affect the entire group — which is why GroupGAP only works when internal audits are as rigorous as the standards themselves.

There’s also a structural vulnerability. With North Shore EVP serving as Hawaiʻi’s primary GroupGAP hub, access depends heavily on continued nonprofit capacity and grant funding. Recent federal cuts across local agriculture underscore how easily progress built on short-term support can stall if that funding disappears.

And while GroupGAP is a national USDA program, its success elsewhere has been uneven — often driven more by buyer mandates than farmer access, and harder to replicate in places without strong organizing infrastructure.

Still, the core lesson holds.

A Quiet Lesson

Hawaiʻi often frames reform as conflict — regulation versus freedom, enforcement versus resistance.

GroupGAP tells a different story.

The standard didn’t change. The farmers didn’t change. The system did.

And when it did, people showed up.

That’s worth sitting with — especially at a moment when so much policy debate assumes resistance is the problem. Sometimes the barrier isn’t attitude or effort.

Sometimes it’s design.

Sometimes the most meaningful reforms aren’t about rewriting the rules. They’re about noticing who the rules quietly assume will fail — and deciding that assumption no longer gets to stand.

“Hawai‘i Grown” is funded in part by grants from the Stupski Foundation, Ulupono Fund at the Hawai‘i Community Foundation and the Frost Family Foundation.