Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2018

About the Author

Beth Fukumoto

Beth Fukumoto served three terms in the Hawaiʻi House of Representatives. She was the youngest woman in the U.S. to lead a major party in a legislature, the first elected Republican to switch parties after Donald Trump’s election, and a Democratic congressional candidate. Currently, she works as a political commentator and teaches leadership and ethics at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Opinions are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Civil Beat’s views. You can reach her by email at columnists@civilbeat.org.

The Legislature is trying to fill a lot of holes in a constantly shifting landscape.

Every year around this time, Hawaiʻi’s Legislature hits a moment that separates the real from the rhetorical. Yes, it’s crossover time.

At the midpoint of the session, the crossover deadline forces lawmakers to make choices. Bills move forward, or they quietly fall away. In theory, this is when priorities become clear. But this year, uncertainty is everywhere, and the stakes feel even higher.

States across the country are navigating a federal policy environment that seems to change by the week. The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” has abruptly shifted billions in Medicaid and SNAP costs onto state budgets. Emergency management funding is up in the air. The Trump administration is wielding federal dollars to push states on everything from immigration to campus policies.

Further, tariff chaos and the war in Iran are disrupting supply chains, driving oil prices higher, and increasing concerns over states’ cybersecurity. Against this backdrop, which of the bills Hawaii’s lawmakers chose to carry forward offer a revealing glimpse into what lawmakers are most concerned about.

Illustration of Hawaii capitol with sun shining in the sky
Civil Beat is focusing on transparency, accountability and ethics in government and other institutions. Help us by sending ideas and anecdotes to sunshine@civilbeat.org.

So far, Hawaiʻi legislators have generally kept pace with national trends on leading issues. On housing, the Legislature considered more than 35 bills, echoing efforts seen in other states to address affordability.

Several major proposals advanced, including House Bill 2476, a constitutional amendment to allow counties to issue bonds for housing infrastructure. Senate Bill 2423, which would block counties from imposing certain lot requirements in urban areas, and House Bill 2049, restructuring the conveyance tax to fund housing priorities, are both a floor vote away from crossing chambers.

Immigration policy also closely followed the patterns of blue and purple states. At least eight immigration bills were introduced, with the most prominent measures reflecting anti-ICE approaches. House Bill 1768, prohibiting law enforcement from assisting in civil immigration enforcement, and House Bill 1870, establishing protected zones around schools, shelters, and other sensitive areas, are both awaiting a third reading in the House. Senate Bill 3322, aiming to limit officers from prolonging stops to check immigration status, is heading to the Senate floor.

On school cellphone bans, Hawaii matched the national trend toward full-day restrictions. House Bill 1559, which prohibits student device use during the instructional day and outlines a confiscation process, advanced toward a floor vote.

Opening Session of the 33rd Legislature January 15th, 2025. Scenes from the opening session of the House of Representatives including the first Transgender Representative and a larger minority Caucus.(David Croxford/Civil Beat/2025)
Lawmakers are trying to keep up with shifting federal funds and other issues with no big initiative emerging as crossover approaches. (David Croxford/Civil Beat/2025)

Lawmakers also acted on artificial intelligence in ways consistent with other states. House Bill 2137, which would ban deepfakes, and Senate Bill 3001, regulating conversational AI for minors, both advanced.

Elections, however, stood out as an exception. While many states debated or adopted new voting restrictions — such as citizenship verification, redistricting changes or proof-of-citizenship requirements — Hawaii’s legislative debate focused on expanding participation.

House Bill 2050, boosting public financing and matching funds for campaigns, passed the House. The bill drew “yes with reservations” from two Republican caucus members and no votes from six other Republicans and two Democrats. House Bill 322, which would allow automatic voter registration, failed to meet the crossover deadline last session but advanced this year. The bill drew opposition with five Republicans voting no and two more with reservations when it passed second reading last year.

Republican bills focused on voter roll maintenance, abolishing ranked-choice voting, and increasing scrutiny of the election process did not advance.

If there’s one issue that overshadows every other this session, it’s the state budget. While lawmakers have been busy on a range of policy fronts, the fiscal outlook remains the central challenge — and the details are still taking shape. The budget itself won’t cross over until mid-March, and Hawaii faces the same unexpected fiscal strain that’s hitting states across the country.

Gov. Josh Green has warned that federal cuts have pulled about $3 billion from Hawaii’s economy, creating a gap lawmakers didn’t anticipate when they approved a multi-year income tax cut package in 2024. If those cuts are fully implemented by 2031, the state could lose more than $1 billion in annual revenue.

The governor responded with House Bill 2306, proposing to pause the tax cuts indefinitely. Lawmakers countered with an amended version: keep the standard deduction hike for working families, freeze bracket adjustments, add a 1% marginal rate for high earners, and rework the child and dependent care credit to better target middle-class families. But the details of spending priorities are still unclear as the process unfolds.

If the session has seemed all over the place so far, that’s because it is. The Legislature is trying to fill a lot of holes in a constantly shifting landscape, but the thing about laws is that you ultimately need to pass something concrete or not.

Regardless of the environment, decisions will have to be made. With the session only halfway through, a lot remains to be seen, and the biggest choices are still ahead.


Read this next:

Who Really Pays For Tariffs?


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Beth Fukumoto

Beth Fukumoto served three terms in the Hawaiʻi House of Representatives. She was the youngest woman in the U.S. to lead a major party in a legislature, the first elected Republican to switch parties after Donald Trump’s election, and a Democratic congressional candidate. Currently, she works as a political commentator and teaches leadership and ethics at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Opinions are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Civil Beat’s views. You can reach her by email at columnists@civilbeat.org.


Latest Comments (0)

Senate Bill 2423 refers presumably to state-mapped urban districts ? Hard to follow its generic language, but if so: Mahalo Sen. Awa for your vote "Nay". Rather than a process with community input & local consent, we'll just wake up in small "urban" areas like Kahalu`, now under fire from developers and speculators freed of R-10 restrictions. We watched much of Kahalu`u change in the 2000's as local 3BR2BA homes with garden & trees got bought up & converted to quasi-legal, zero-lot line McMansions, mostly by the mainland STR types. There were NO upgrades to runoff, drainage, roadways, etc; while density doubled, so did flooding. DPR issued permits to freely upgrade houses, but failed to assess the effects in the aggregate - presumably a reason permits are needed to begin with. Just because the maps aren't so detailed to distinguish Kahalu`u from Kaka`ako shouldn't automagically permit new investors to throw babies out with the bathwater. Waikane isn't Waikiki.

Kamanulai · 1 month ago

The sentence "abolishing ranked choice voting" makes no sense, as Hawaii doesn't have ranked choice. Could the author please clarify?

kim · 1 month ago

Legislation is like a hot dog - you can enjoy eating it but you are better off not seeing how it’s made . . . And then, of course, you have the vegetarians who will never be happy!

Harvey · 1 month ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

Ideas is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaiʻi. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaiʻi, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Stay updated with the latest news from Maui.
  • What's this? Weekly coverage of Hawaiʻi Island news and community.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.