Tom Yamachika: Ige’s Veto Of The ‘Revolving Door’ Bill - Honolulu Civil Beat

Over the next five days, supporters Darlene and John Abt are pledging to match your new monthly donation 12 times or double your one-time gift, all up to $7,500!

We've raised $32,000 toward our $100,000 goal!

Donate Now

More than 550 donors have already made gifts during our summer campaign!

Over the next five days, supporters Darlene and John Abt are pledging to match your new monthly donation 12 times or double your one-time gift, all up to $7,500!

We've raised $32,000 toward our $100,000 goal!

Donate Now

More than 550 donors have already made gifts during our summer campaign!

About the Author

Tom Yamachika

Tom Yamachika is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

On Sept. 15, Governor Ige released the final list of bills he is vetoing from the 2020 legislative session. The list included House Bill 2124, which some people have called the “Revolving Door Bill.”

Currently, the State Ethics Code, in HRS section 84-18, says that after leaving state employment, a person may not represent a client for compensation before that agency for 12 months after employment.

It does allow a former state agency employee to become a lobbyist and represent clients before the Legislature, or to represent clients before another state agency.

The definition of employee in the ethics code is broad and includes members of volunteer boards and commissions. Thus, a volunteer member of a state Board of Taxation Review can’t practice before the Department of Taxation for the duration of the person’s term and for one year afterward.

Tax professionals thinking of joining the Board of Review may find it tough to have their practices restricted for multiple years, which makes it hard to find qualified people to be on that type of volunteer board. We have written about the problem before; that problem still is unresolved.

HB 2124 apparently is targeted at people who go from an agency to being a lobbyist or vice versa and wants to make sure that there is no appearance of corruption or impropriety.

Under the bill, a variety of elected and appointed positions, including most department heads and all members of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, agribusiness development corporation, campaign spending commission, Hawaii community development authority, Hawaii housing finance and development corporation, Hawaii tourism authority, and the public utilities commission will not be allowed to represent clients before the Legislature or any executive branch agency for a 12-month period after leaving the state agency.

Appearance Of Corruption

The governor vetoed the bill because the “additional restrictions imposed on volunteer board and commission members who fulfill an important role in protecting our community through their service without compensation will make it significantly more challenging to attract and recruit the most qualified individuals for service on boards and commissions.”

Many of the people at whom the bill was directed, elected officials and department heads, are compensated and are not volunteers, so the objections in the governor’s message are largely inapplicable. But it seems to us that the bill is flawed for a different reason: it goes too far.

The bill is not concerned with preventing corruption, for there are different laws making corruption illegal. The bill addresses the appearance of corruption.

If an agency director’s job ends in November and he turns out to be a lobbyist in January, it may seem like something fishy is going on (the appearance) although nothing of the sort is happening (the reality).

Ethics laws exist to promote trust in government, and the avoidance of impropriety, in appearance as well as in fact, is important to that objective. But that must be balanced against the reality of the talent market.

Ethics laws exist to promote trust in government.

For the position of Director of Taxation, for example, we probably want someone who knows about our tax laws. Probably the most common way to acquire that knowledge is to work as a tax professional.

If we are going to tell potential candidates for such a position that they won’t be able to work in their chosen profession for five or nine years after taking the job, many candidates will rightfully wonder about how they are going to feed their families after their limited term ends. The bill will make the economic pain more difficult to avoid, which may well result in more candidates walking away.

If we want to have talented people leading our departments and populating our commissions, we should make their exit strategies easier, not harder. Perhaps if we attract more talented people, we will move toward restoring trust in our government — more than would be possible by heaping restrictions and prohibitions on those people (especially volunteers) who have a genuine desire to help our lot through government service.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Read this next:

Hawaii Is Leading The Clean Energy Transformation

Not a subscription

Civil Beat is a small nonprofit newsroom, and we’re committed to a paywall-free website and subscription-free content because we believe in journalism as a public service. That’s why donations from readers like you are essential to our continued existence.

Help keep our journalism free for all readers by becoming a monthly member of Civil Beat today.


About the Author

Tom Yamachika

Tom Yamachika is the president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

Latest Comments (0)

Thank you Tom,  While the revolving door is a big problem in our system I see your point that for volunteer board positions involving tax professionals this bill would work against better governance.  Since tax issues always involve the government, volunteer board members would not have been allowed to work in their profession while on a volunteer board and for 12 months afterwards.  I don't know how hard it is to carve out tax professionals who are volunteering on State boards from the wording.  I wonder if this bill would work with that carve-out.  

PacFriesen · 1 year ago

Join the conversation


IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email to submit an idea.


You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.