Chad Blair: How About Ranked-Choice Voting And Open Primaries For Hawaii? - Honolulu Civil Beat


About the Author

Chad Blair

Chad Blair is the politics and opinion editor for Civil Beat. You can reach him by email at cblair@civilbeat.org or follow him on Twitter at @chadblairCB.


Hawaii made significant progress on election reform by implementing voting by mail. The result: Total voter registration in the general election grew from 437,664 in 2016 (the previous presidential election year) to 579,784, while total turnout was nearly 70%, up more than 11 percentage points.

The greater interest in the 2020 elections was certainly influenced by the historic Trump-Biden battle, and voting by mail just made good sense during the pandemic.

But Hawaii’s new system makes it easier to vote and bodes well for greater citizen participation in a state where such interest has been anemic for too long.

Now, the Hawaii Legislature can build on that momentum in the 2021 session by giving serious attention to two other election reform ideas that are slowly catching on elsewhere in the country: nonpartisan open primaries and ranked-choice voting. Both have the potential to help voters get the elected officials they most prefer.

Both “pro-democracy” measures, as an advocacy group describes them, were narrowly approved last month in Alaska. Ballot Measure 2 took two years and about $7 million from supporters to pass. It requires Alaska’s election system “to be entirely rewritten” within two years, says the Anchorage Daily News:

Instead of two primary elections — one for Republicans and another for everyone else — all candidates for an office will be put into a single election. The top four vote-getters from that election, regardless of political party, will advance to the general election. In November, voters will rank those four candidates, picking one as their first choice, another as their second, and so on down the list.

Alaska’s new law is expected to be challenged in the courts, especially by Republicans who dominate state politics. As Alaska Public Media reported, “Supporters say the change would reduce political parties’ power to shape the results, as they would lose the ability to block members of other parties from participating in their primaries, like Republicans do now.”

Still, Alaska is now the fourth state to adopt nonpartisan, open primaries. The others are California, Washington and Nebraska. As for ranked-choice voting, Maine is the only other state besides Alaska that has it — in Maine’s case, it’s for U.S. senators and representatives, governor and the state legislature.

Voter holds their paper ballot stub at Farrington High School.
Now that Hawaii has successfully moved to all-mail voting, lawmakers should give serious consideration to more electoral reform ideas such as ranked-choice voting and nonpartisan open primaries. Cory Lum/Civil Beat

Complex, Confusing Laws

Making it easier to understand how primaries work is important. As the National Conference of State Legislatures observes, “The laws governing state primaries are complex and nuanced to say the least, and state primary laws have been a cause of confusion among voters and election administrators alike.”

NCSL categorizes primaries in six ways: closed, partially closed, partially open, open to unaffiliated voters, open or top-two. Hawaii is considered to be one of 15 states with an open primary, but it is a bit misleading, in my view.

Hawaii does not ask voters to choose parties on their voter registration forms, which means they can select any particular party’s ballot privately when they vote. But voters can only pick a single party’s ballot.

In the 2020 primary, that meant selecting from a total of seven parties: Democrat, Republican, Green, Libertarian and three others including the nonpartisan ballot. (An eighth recognized party in the state, the Constitution party, fielded only two candidates this year: a ticket for U.S. president and vice president.)

Picking only a single party ballot meant that a registered voter living in, say, the Ewa Beach area could not vote for Green Party candidate Calvin Griffin for Hawaii’s 1st Congressional District, Democrat Rida Cabanilla Arakawa for the state Senate seat and nonpartisan Ryan Uehara for the state House. Instead, the voter could only pick one party ballot, something that was established at the 1978 Constitutional Convention in order to protect voter privacy and to encourage participation in elections.

I am not making a judgment as to whether Griffin, Cabanilla Arakawa (a House rep trying to become a senator) and Uehara were the better candidates. But I think a lack of choices has led to Hawaii nearly always voting for incumbents or familiar names — in this case, the eventual winners of those respective races: incumbent Democrat Rep. Ed Case, incumbent Republican state Sen. Kurt Fevella and former state Rep. Matt LoPresti, a Democrat.

In the general election voters are not restricted to voting for candidates from just one party. Put another way, they get to vote for whomever they want, but only once the candidates survive the primary. That’s why many primary elections often are more important than general elections in our islands.

It’s Our Party

Local Democrats, who have long controlled the political levers in the state, will likely oppose nonpartisan open primaries.

Indeed, Party Chair Tyler Dos Santos-Tam told me that his party has “long taken the position that the Democratic Party primaries should be open only to those who register as Party members when they register to vote (as is done in many states around the country) or people who sign up as Democratic Party members.”

In 2013, Democrats sued to overturn Hawaii’s open primary election, alleging that the party’s First Amendment associational rights were being violated.

“Why should (a party opponent) have the same right to nominate our candidates as the hardest-working, longest-suffering, most-donating member? And yet, that’s the law,” said Tony Gill, the attorney representing the party in a 2014 interview.

Democrats ultimately lost the case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.

It also seems unlikely that a Legislature dominated by Democrats might consider nonpartisan open primaries, although a bill from Rep. Sylvia Luke in 2019 that would have accomplished as much did get a hearing before it was shelved.

Chair Judiciary Karl Rhoads during mail in ballot hearing held in room 016 at the Capitol.
Senate Judiciary Chair Karl Rhoads says he’ll likely submit a ranked choice voting bill this coming session. Cory Lum/Civil Beat

Which brings us to ranked-choice voting. Several bills in the 2019-2020 sessions called for setting up such a system. The one that made it the farthest in terms of being heard would have established ranked choice for special federal elections and special elections of vacant county council seats.

Sen. Karl Rhoads, the bill’s author, said he will probably submit a similar bill next month.

“I think it has a lot going for it,” he said, pointing to two examples where Hawaii voters may not have elected the most preferred candidate.

One race was the special election in 2010 to complete the remainder of U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie’s term when he resigned to run for governor.

Republican Charles Djou won the winner-take-all contest with 39% of the vote, although Democrats Colleen Hanabusa (with almost 31%) and Case (with almost 28%) showed how a Democratic candidate was preferred in a large field. Djou would lose the general election that year to Hanabusa and would lose subsequent congressional races, while Case — who formerly represented the 2nd Congressional District — now represents the 1st.

The other race Rhoads mentioned was the special election that same year to complete the remaining two years of Honolulu City Councilman Todd Apo, who resigned to work for Disney’s Aulani Resort. Tom Berg, a Tea Party activist and a bit of a live wire, won the race with just 18% of the vote. He was not re-elected.

“Those races are the ones where it shows how special elections can result in really strange results,” said Rhoads. “There is no way a Republican should have been elected in CD1, and Berg won with just a small percentage.”

Rep. Mark Nakashima, Rhoads judiciary chair counterpart in the House, said he is “supportive” of considering ranked-choice-voting legislation next year but would not make any decision until legislation is introduced. But he previously backed similar measures in the House.

Rhoads said he’d like to see how ranked choice works out for special elections before taking it “to the next level” for other elections.

As for nonpartisan open primaries, he said, “There is something to be said for the two highest finishers in a primary moving on no matter who they are. But it would be a fairly major departure for us.”


Read this next:

Denby Fawcett: These Native Hawaiian Plants Are Dying — Here's Why We Should Care


Before you go…

During a crisis like this, it’s more important than ever to dig beyond the news, to figure out what government policies mean for ordinary citizens and how those policies were put together.

This is perhaps the biggest, most consequential story our reporters will ever cover. And at no other time in Civil Beat’s history have we relied on your support more. Please consider supporting Civil Beat by making a tax-deductible gift.

Contribute

About the Author

Chad Blair

Chad Blair is the politics and opinion editor for Civil Beat. You can reach him by email at cblair@civilbeat.org or follow him on Twitter at @chadblairCB.


Latest Comments (0)

I think this article misses the bigger point. Nothing will really change until money is taken out of politics, and that means public financing of elections. So, as an example:1) If a candidate for mayor raises $10,000 in contributions of $200 or less they receive public financing. All candidates who qualify will get the same amount, and be prohibited from accepting outside funds. 2) In addition, all candidates will need to submit nominating petitions, with the signatures of 3,750 registered voters (approximately 1% of the votes cast in the general). This forces candidates, or at least their campaigns, to meet the voters.3) Some mechanism needs to be devised to ban what happened with the Carpenters Union being able to spend $700,000 to help Blangiardi. That is a perversion of democracy. Maybe reducing a candidates matching funds by every dollar spent on their behalf. The upshot of this would be that a more varied group of viewpoints would be aired.  In 2020 the voters would have benefitted from hearing from real progressives, and also real conservatives, not just the same pro-business and in-crowd groups represented by Blangiardi and Amemiya.  

TannedTom · 4 months ago

Excerpt from a July/August 2020 Harvard Business review article by the authors of "The Politics Industry: How Political Innovation Can Break Partisan Gridlock and Save Our Democracy" published in June, 2020. "The final-five voting model—the combination of the top five candidates in open primary elections advancing to general elections, and ranked-choice voting to choose the winner in general elections—eliminates the "eye of the needle" and "spoiler" problems we described earlier. "Thus we believe it is the most promising and effective way to create incentives for legislators to work in the public interest and to open congressional election fields to new and dynamic competition—the threat of which will hold elected officials more accountable to voters for results."Final-five voting is less about changing who gets elected and far more about changing the incentives governing the behavior of those in office. It’s about the benefits of healthy competition in the marketplace for public policy."

Slammer · 4 months ago

I support Alaska's new law and think it should be implemented here in the state of Hawaii as well.

Scotty_Poppins · 4 months ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.