We Need Housing, Education And Health Care More Than Radar - Honolulu Civil Beat

About the Author

Gary Hooser

Gary Hooser is the board president of the Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action and the executive director of the Pono Hawaii Initiative.

Hawaii’s congressional delegation is hopefully dropping its push for the $1.9 billion radar project the Pentagon says it doesn’t want, isn’t needed and is already obsolete.

The politics of the opportunity at first glance seem irresistible: Bring home to the district $1.9 billion of economic development PLUS protect Hawaii from future missile attacks.

What’s not to like?

Well, for starters there is the waste of taxpayer funds, the increased militarization of our island (and the planet), the inevitable negative environmental impacts, the false economy this expansion would create, the inflated housing costs and the continued desecration of ceded lands.

The political push for the money is no doubt a well-intended basic desire to “take care of the district” by bringing home the bacon of jobs and economic development. While the goal of supporting Hawaii’s economy is a worthy one, the path of increased military spending, especially on this particular project, is not.

Likewise the fear-based rationale, while politically compelling, is a false dilemma.

Twice now the Pentagon itself has said they do not need or want the $1.9 billion Homeland Defense Radar – Hawaii project. The widely read publication Defense News reported that the director of the Missile Defense Agency, Vice Admiral Jon Hill, in February 2020 said that the agency decided to hit the brakes on its plans to set up the radars in the Pacific, instead planning to take a new look at the sensor architecture in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command region.

Hill noted, said the article, that the area is covered by a forward-deployed AN/TPY-2 radar in Hawaii, the deployable Sea-Based X-Band radar and mobile radars on Aegis ships that can be repositioned as needed to address near-term threats.

An artist’s rendering of the proposed $1.9 billion Homeland Defense Radar – Hawaii. Missile Defense Agency

My father was a career Navy man, a chief boatswains mate who served honorably for over 30 years. I have friends and relatives who are veterans and who now serve in the Middle East. I am proud and thankful for their service, and I believe the United States must maintain a strong defense.

However, enough is enough. According to numerous public sources, annual military spending by the United States was $732 billion in 2019 and accounted for 38% of global military expenditures.

China was second at $261 billion, followed by India at $71 billion and Russia in fourth place at $65.1 billion. For some context: North Korea spent $3.6 billion, Iran spent between $12 and $20 billion, and Afghanistan $0.23 billion.

In addition to far outspending virtually every other country in the world arming ourselves, the United States is also the top seller of military arms to the rest of the world, delivering 76% more material than runner-up Russia.

According to a Stockholm International Peace Research Institute study reported in Defense News, “The U.S. provided major arms — defined as air defense systems, armored vehicles, missiles and satellites, among other material — to 96 countries in those five years, with half of the weapons going to the Middle East.”

It’s well past time for the madness to stop and for Hawaii to lead.

We don’t need no stinking radar. What we need is housing, education and medical care. And if there is extra federal money laying around, perhaps we can expand funding for the Matsunaga Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Read this next:

Peter Apo: How Should We Define Hawaiian In The 21st Century?

Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Honolulu Civil Beat is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.


About the Author

Gary Hooser

Gary Hooser is the board president of the Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action and the executive director of the Pono Hawaii Initiative.

Latest Comments (0)

The Third Tier missile defense radar in Oahu was a Tulsi Gabbard 'sugar sweetener' for Hawaii as her Presidential campaign lost steam. She figured a big development project with a lot of jobs would buy her some more votes. As with all things Tulsi, she had no clue how the missile defense radar works and where it needs to be located to be functional. The odds of North Korea launching an atomic bomb warhead ICBM against Pearl Harbor was ridiculous. They would get nothing from it, for some momentary Photo Op, then watch Pyongyang be vaporized? Even Kim Jong Un sees that is a Zero-Sum game. The Russians are going to launch over the North Pole and recently demonstrated ballistic attack submarines surfacing at the North Pole and launching test missile salvos. That Third Tier radar needs to be on the border of Montana and Canada, the SM Block III intercept missiles on mobile launchers. It would be the last line of defense to protect Cheyenne Mountain. Putting a Third Tier missile defense radar in Oahu makes no practical sense and the Hawaii reps should just let it go, suggesting the land based system at the US northern border.

gigafaze · 2 years ago

Housing, education, health care, AND environmental protection.  Stuff like radar, a new stadium, and funding for the Hawaii Tourism Authority are not even on the list.

sleepingdog · 2 years ago

According to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, "$21 TRILLION of Pentagon financial transactions "could not be traced, documented, or explained."  And our congressional delegation is looking to add a $1.9 billion radar project the Pentagon says it doesn’t want, isn’t needed and is already obsolete. Instead they should be looking for more accountability from the military, not to mention uses that we, the people, truly need. It begs the question of exactly who "in the district" are they really supporting with such a project?

taueva · 2 years ago

Join the conversation


IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on every aspect of life and public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.


You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.