Amy Perruso is an educator who represents House District 46 (Wahiawa, Whitmore Village, Launani Valley) in the Hawaii Legislature.
The big real estate trusts pay little or no state corporate income tax on the money they earn.
Hawaiʻi is losing tens of millions of dollars every year to one of the most powerful and least understood corporate tax loopholes in the country: the dividends paid deduction, or DPD, for real estate investment trusts.
REITs are investment vehicles — often billion-dollar corporations — that own and manage real estate such as hotels, shopping centers, apartment complexes, and industrial parks.
They enjoy a special tax privilege: under federal law, REITs can deduct from their taxable income all dividends they pay to shareholders, as long as they distribute at least 90% of their profits.
This deduction, the DPD, means that REITs pay little or no corporate income tax on the money they earn.
Civil Beat is focusing on transparency, accountability and ethics in government and other institutions. Help us by sending ideas and anecdotes to sunshine@civilbeat.org.
At the federal level, those dividends are then taxed when shareholders receive them. But in Hawaiʻi, most REIT shareholders live elsewhere.
According to DBEDT, between 95% and 99% of REIT shareholders with Hawaiʻi property holdings are nonresidents. Only 0.5% to 3% of Hawaiʻi resident taxpayers reported owning shares in REITs with Hawaiʻi-based properties.
So while the profits are generated here — through our land, infrastructure, workforce and visitors — the taxable income flows out of state, untaxed by Hawaiʻi.
Because Hawaiʻi’s tax code conforms to federal law, it automatically adopts this deduction. That means REITs operating in Hawaiʻi — owning properties like Waikīkī Beach Walk, Hilton Hawaiian Village, and major shopping centers — can claim the DPD and pay virtually no state corporate income tax.
HIlton Hawaiian Village is owned by a real estate investment trust. (Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2015)
A state study found that REITs with Hawaiʻi properties were shielding roughly $720 million in income each year — translating to tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue annually. These are dollars that could fund affordable housing, repair schools and strengthen public health systems.
This loophole does more than drain revenue — it fuels speculation. Because REITs enjoy a tax advantage unavailable to local businesses, they can bid up property prices and acquire more land, accelerating gentrification and displacement. The result is a system where wealth is extracted from Hawaiʻi and concentrated in the hands of distant investors, while local residents shoulder higher costs and fewer services.
Why The Loophole Persists
Hawaiʻi’s REIT carve-out is not inevitable — it’s political. The national REIT trade association, Nareit, spends heavily to preserve the DPD. Through lobbying, public messaging and consultant-driven campaigns, they warn that taxing REITs would deter investment. Yet REITs operate profitably in other states that impose entity-level taxes or limit the deduction.
Another factor is the steady stream of campaign contributions from REIT-linked entities that reinforce the status quo. Between 2018 and 2024, such donations totaled roughly $133,750, spread across multiple election cycles and targeted toward influential committees and policymakers.
In a small state like Hawaiʻi, even modest contributions can secure access, shape narratives and slow reform — not through corruption per se, but through systemic imbalance, where organized capital speaks louder than the public.
This is how structural power operates: not through a single bad actor, but through a web of incentives, habits and fears that privilege outside investors over local needs.
The Path Forward
Ending the DPD at the state level would simply put REITs on the same footing as every other business operating in Hawaiʻi. They use our roads, rely on our workers and profit from our communities; they should contribute to the public systems that make those profits possible.
Restoring this lost revenue — $30 million to $50 million a year — would allow us to build housing, expand school meals and invest in climate resilience without raising regressive taxes. It would slow speculative land grabs and keep more wealth circulating locally.
The taxable income flows out of state, untaxed by Hawaiʻi.
This is not anti-business — it’s pro-community. Fair taxation ensures that the benefits of economic activity are shared, not siphoned away.
Hawaiʻi’s REIT loophole is a choice, not a law of nature. We can choose fairness over extraction, stability over speculation, and sovereignty over subservience to distant shareholders.
The question isn’t whether REITs can afford to pay — they can. The question is whether Hawaiʻi can afford not to make them.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this essay referred incorrectly to the tax status of Ward Village.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
The intent of REITs is good for the common person but the huge corporations use it for their benefit and at the expense of the people of Hawaii. This has been known for years but no changes by our leaders. Sad situation... This needs to be written about regularly and explained for "us regular guys" to understand fully and then maybe there will be some action by politicians whose primary goal is to get re-elected .
Engawa808·
7 months ago
There will always be opposite perspectives on this issue and I'm not a proponent of more taxes because state and county government are so inefficient and often embroiled in corruption that it makes it hard to just pour more money into a system that produces lackluster results. That said, if you are looking at REIT's for revenue, then you can not ignore looking at all religious organizations for at the very minimum, property taxes. It would be interesting to compare the REIT and religious holdings to compare the amount of taxes that are not paid here.
wailani1961·
7 months ago
Two issues here: 1) Taxation of REITs; and 2) government spending efficacy (or lack thereof). These are mutually exclusive, and problems in #2 should not preclude the State (and taxpayers) from pursuit of #1. We should *always* strive that our elected representatives and career govt employees spend taxpayer funds wisely. But also the flip side: we should always strive to generate revenue wisely, efficiently, honestly + justly. Generate the revenue! It's the pono thing to do.
Ideas is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaiʻi. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaiʻi, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.