House Bill 2748, which will become law soon, is sometimes referred to as the “Bob Nakata bill” after the former legislator, now reverend, who was one of the bill’s champions. It aims to advance the goal of providing “affordable housing” in our island state.

One part of the bill appropriates $200 million to the Rental Housing Revolving Fund, which, according to the law establishing the fund, is for grants and loans to developers creating affordable housing.

A report of the administering agency, the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corp., states that in calendar year 2016 the agency doled out $29 million in grants, and made no loans because of “excessive errors and incomplete responses” in the loan applications that it received that year.

Sen Donovan Delacruz acknowledges Rev Bob Nakata calling the new over $500 million housing bill the ‘Bob Nakata Bill’ and he can retire now.

The new affordable housing law is called the “Bob Nakata Bill,” the former legislator and longtime activist. But the bill has costly consequences, the author says.

Cory Lum/Civil Beat

In any event, it does not look like this fund is aptly named because revolving funds are supposed to be financially self-sustaining, which is difficult when the fund pays out millions of dollars where there is no clear expectation that the agency will get any of it back. So it appears that this $200 million, or most of it, is headed out the door with no visible means of getting it back.

But that wasn’t the costliest part of the bill.

The bill also extends the general excise tax exemption for affordable housing projects from 2022 to 2030, and increases the annual aggregate general excise tax cost cap for all projects certified by HHFDC from $7 million to $30 million. The general excise tax exemption can be claimed by nearly any vendor involved in the planning or construction of the project, so the exemption totals add up quickly.

The bill also adds an anti-discrimination provision for participants in Section 8, a federal program where low income participants have part of their rent paid by the program.

If the general excise tax provision lasts until 2030 (as we know in politics, nothing is certain), then this part of the bill is projected to cost more than $300 million in lost revenue.

The issue with expanding the general excise tax exemption is you erode the general excise tax base. The tax base refers to the aggregate value of transactions the tax can be assessed on.

General excise tax is assessed on almost every business transaction and because it covers so many types of transactions, the tax rate can be kept relatively low (4 percent) compared to other states with a sales tax or something similar to one.

The issue with expanding the general excise tax exemption is you erode the general excise tax base.

While affordable housing seems like a noble cause, creating any exemption from general excise tax erodes the tax base. Any exemption which puts one cause on an unequal footing from another cause results in winners and losers.

So while an exemption for being a vendor in an affordable housing seems like a worthy cause, what makes it nobler than selling life-saving prescription drugs to a hospital? General excise tax is assessed on the latter.

To put it another way, exemptions in the tax code create a kind of discrimination. The favored businesses or causes don’t have to pay the tax, and the rest of us have to shoulder the costs of government that the favored businesses otherwise would have paid.

This is why many tax policy analysts favor a broad base and a low rate. This type of tax costs less for most of us, is easier to enforce, and does not create this

feeling of inequity among taxpayers. Indeed, one reason why our GET has a very low rate is because it’s extremely broad, much more so than in any other state.

Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes. And you can still comment on stories on our Facebook page.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Columns generally run about 800 words (yes, they can be shorter or longer) and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Our journalism needs your help.

While asking for your support is something we don’t like to do, the simple fact is that our reporters, our journalism, and our impact rely on it. Since lifting our paywall and becoming a nonprofit in mid-2016, our local newsroom has benefitted from a stream of charitable support from people who want our type of journalism to survive. People like you who understand that our work is essential to a better-informed community. If you value the work of our journalists, show us with your tax-deductible support.

About the Authors