The Hawaii Campaign Spending Commission is taking an interest in the Pacific Resource Partnership and whether it violated any laws during the 2012 mayoral campaign.
Recently released emails show how PRP and its consultants worked to undermine the campaign of former Hawaii Gov. Ben Cayetano, who was running for mayor on a platform to kill the city’s $5.26 billion rail project.
Among the revelations was that PRP was working on its campaign several months before officially forming its political action committee, doing opposition research and poll testing future attack ad messages.
Honolulu rail construction near Kapolei on June 5.
PF Bentley/Civil Beat
Civil Beat reported that several of PRP’s political strategists and public relations specialists who were heavily involved in the efforts to weaken Cayetano did not appear in any of the PAC’s campaign spending reports.
Campaign Spending Commission Attorney Gary Kam said his agency is now looking into the “apparent vendors” who did not appear in PRP’s finance reports. He declined to go into specifics.
They include Texas-based opposition researcher Jason Stanford; Barbara Tanabe and Jim McCoy, who worked for Hoakea Communications at the time; and Andy Winer, U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz’s chief of staff, who in 2012 was working on U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono’s campaign.
PRP is a consortium of union carpenters and contractors that advocates for projects to benefit its membership. The group is a major supporter of the rail project.
In 2012, PRP launched a major campaign against Cayetano in the mayoral election that included a deluge of negative advertising. Campaign Spending Commission reports show the group spent more than $3.6 million in the election.
Cayetano was never accused of wrongdoing because it was the contributors who had given fake names to skirt donor limits. He also said he had no idea the contributions were illegal.
PRP’s ad campaign tried to tie these donations to no-bid contracts that were awarded to some of the contributors during Cayetano’s administration, describing it as a “pay-to-play” scheme.
The group also attacked Cayetano for not paying back the full $540,000 in contributions. By the time the donations were found to be illegal, Cayetano only had about $8,000 left in his campaign coffers. He paid that amount back and closed his campaign committee, meaning he didn’t have to pay back the remainder.
When he decided to run for mayor in 2012 he opened a new campaign committee. PRP pushed the idea that Cayetano should still be on the hook for the illegal donations he received more than a decade before, saying he found a “loophole” in the law.
Nick Grube is a reporter for Civil Beat. You can reach him by email at nick@civilbeat.org or follow him on Twitter at @nickgrube. You can also reach him by phone at 808-377-0246.