Hawaii medical marijuana patients may not have to toil over the stove baking edibles for much longer.
Amendments passed recently to House Bill 2729, a wide-ranging medical cannabis bill, would allow dispensaries to manufacture edible, marijuana-infused products such as baked goods, gum, drinks or candy. They would need to be sold with a warning label and could not contain more than 10 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive chemical in marijuana.
Medical cannabis is legal in Hawaii, but the federal government still classifies it as a Schedule I drug “with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse,” alongside meth, heroin and ecstasy. Some employers still bar medical cannabis patients from using the drug because of conflicts between state and federal laws, but that also could change under the current Senate draft of the bill.
Employers would be prohibited from firing or discriminating against employees who are medical marijuana patients if they test positive for cannabis unless that person is a state law enforcement officer or must drive or operates heavy machinery on the job.
Edibles and workplace protections were high priority requests for cannabis advocates, but separate legislation to accomplish both already died this session.
“Right now, no one is protected (at work) and that’s really unacceptable,” said Carl Bergquist, head of the Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii. “There’s no reason for us to have had legal medical cannabis for two decades almost … and tout its value but if you actually work somewhere, you can get fired.”
Hawaii’s medical marijuana law was passed in 2000. The state law paving the way for dispensaries was passed in 2015.
HB 2729 is now headed to a Senate floor vote. If it’s approved, it would go to conference committee, where appointees from both chambers would attempt to work out differences.
The amendments to HB 2729 were proposed by Sen. Roz Baker, chair of the Committee on Consumer Protection and Health, who introduced a similar bill that died in the Senate.
Baker emphasized the importance of proper labeling, dosing and packaging for edibles. She said it’s important for edibles to be sold in clear packaging so they can be inspected without being opened.
As for worker protection, Baker noted that most patients take medical cannabis for pain management. Those patients likely wouldn’t be in construction or other industries exempted from allowing patient protections under the bill.
“We wanted to make sure that just because a person is a medical cannabis patient and they’re qualified to use, except in certain circumstances, they should not be suspended, or discharged or discriminated against,” she said.
Baker said she hopes the House will agree with the Senate’s amendments and pass “a good bill” that better serves cannabis patients.
Rep. John Mizuno, introducer of HB 2729 and chair of the House Committee on Health and Human Services, said he supported the new amendments. He said he had been worried that Baker might trim the bill down.
“If anything, she Christmas tree’d it,” he said.
Mizuno did take issue with a provision that prohibits “gummies, brightly colored candies, or other products designed to appeal to children or bear resemblance to other commercially available products.”
Mizuno said he would prefer the convenience of a gummy bear if he were a cannabis patient, but emphasized the importance of proper labeling.
He enthusiastically supported the employee protection provisions.
Taking prescribed pain medication after a surgery, for example, is acceptable. Cannabis use should be legal for patients too, he said, as long as they aren’t in a job that requires operating heavy machinery.
“If I’m in the office and going through paperwork … at the most I might get sleepy,” Mizuno said. “Am I a danger to anyone else?”
Bergquist of the Drug Policy Forum noted that mainland courts have increasingly sided with ousted employees who were fired on the basis of their cannabis use.
Some employers say they don’t allow workers to use medical marijuana because they want to be in compliance with federal law.
“For an employer to hide behind that and say they might get in trouble seems disingenuous,” Bergquist said, adding employees are the only ones who would be at risk under federal law.
Critics of cannabis edibles worry children will confuse edibles, which are often dessert items, with regular sweets.
Edibles are a slower-releasing, longer-lasting product, Bergquist said. They’re easier to consume than smoking, but users can inadvertently consume too much because edibles take longer to kick in.
Selling edibles in dispensaries could benefit people who don’t have the time or skills to make their own, he said. It also ensures patients — who may have bad outcomes when making their own edibles — are getting the proper strength and dose, he said.
HB 2729 also creates a system allowing eligible tourists to buy medical cannabis. Out-of-state customers may be used to using edibles, Bergquist said.
The state Department of Health opposed the sale of edibles in written testimony.
“Delayed effects (of edibles) may lead persons to consume more edibles and cause overdosing,” the department wrote.
There have been no reported deaths from marijuana overdoses, according to the federal Drug Enforcement Agency.
Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to firstname.lastname@example.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes. And you can still comment on stories on our Facebook page.