The House and Senate have to work out major differences if the bill is to pass in the next two weeks.

The push to ban aquarium fishing in Hawaiʻi has advanced farther in the current legislative session than it has in years, clearing both the House and Senate, but it’s also been heavily watered down to get that far, conservation advocates say.

Now, it remains to be seen whether one of the session’s most hotly contested measures can survive the pivotal conference committee process that’s underway, as representatives from both chambers meet to try and hash out differences on a flurry of bills. 

For years, Earthjustice senior attorney Mahesh Cleveland said, state lawmakers and the Hawai‘i Division of Aquatic Resources have treated aquarium fishing “like a game of hot potato” — each deferring to the other on what to do about such strongly debated environmental, commercial and cultural issues.

“The bottom line is, the Legislature should make the change,” said Cleveland, whose environmental legal advocacy group has represented groups pushing for years to ban the practice. “That really provides a real clear directive to the agency as far as what to do.”

Kole, or goldring surgeonfish, have been the second most popular reef fish collected in Hawaii for aquarium enthrusiasts.
Kole, or goldring surgeonfish, have been the second most popular reef fish collected in Hawai‘i for aquarium enthusiasts. A measure that would at least temporarily ban the fish collections is still moving in the Legislature. (Craig Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)

Neither the House nor the Senate has announced who will serve on the conference committee to take up House Bill 2101 affecting aquarium fishing’s future in the islands. The practice has fueled widespread community scorn, particularly on the Big Island, largely because fish such as yellow tang are taken from local reef ecosystems and sold abroad in the pet industry. 

But some local fishers have strongly lobbied for the collections to resume after court decisions halted them nearly a decade ago. State aquatic resource officials have also recommended for years that the trade resume, saying limited collections won’t harm existing populations.

Arguably the biggest detail for House and Senate members to resolve is where, exactly, the ban would take effect in Hawaiian waters. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs originally included the proposal in its legislative package this year, and it called for the ban to apply statewide.

House members in a 43-8 vote opted to go with an aquarium-collections ban on the Big Island, home to the Kona Coast that’s widely coveted by collectors. When the measure reached the Senate, the ban was changed to instead only apply to Oʻahu. 

Two Big Island senators, Lorraine Inouye and Tim Richards, expressed misgivings about creating a ban on the Big Island while the issue plays out in court and state aquatic resource officials set rules that would allow more than 200,000 aquarium fish to be collected from the reefs there.

“We have due process within our state,” Richards said Tuesday, “and if we don’t follow due process we’re not being fair to the constituency.”

Four individuals sitting at parallel desks placed one in front of the other. The three men at left wear dark blazers and ties, and the woman at right wears a medium colored blazer.
State senators, including Big Island’s Tim Richards, changed the aquarium fishing bill so the ban would only apply to Oʻahu. (Craig Fujii/Civil Beat/2026)

Community members showed up en masse at a public hearing in Kona earlier this month to oppose the aquatic resource division’s proposed rules to restart aquarium fishing along that coast.

If an issue arises in the process that would stop the division from issuing those Big Island permits, Richards said, he would join other senators to introduce a new ban.

The Senate’s version of the bill, which passed last week in a 19-6 vote, also calls for the aquarium-fishing ban to be lifted once state aquatic officials complete new conservation rules for Oʻahu aimed to make fishing more sustainable there, under the state’s Holomua Marine Initiative. 

That conservation initiative was previously the Marine 30×30 initiative and looked to better manage at least 30% of Hawaiʻi’s nearshore waters by 2030. State natural resource leaders rolled back the somewhat vague 30% goal, however, amid heavy pressure from local fishers.

“It’s very watered down and not even sure it’s a ban anymore. It’s like a temporary ban,” Cleveland said. “The way to make this bill work would be for the champions in the conference committees to bring the bill closer back to what it started out as, which was a straight-up prohibition on commercial collection.”

Conference committee meetings continue through May 1.

Civil Beat’s coverage of environmental issues on Hawaiʻi island is supported in part by a grant from the Dorrance Family Foundation; coverage of climate change and the environment is supported by The Healy Foundation, the Marisla Fund of the Hawai‘i Community Foundation and the Frost Family Foundation.

What stories will you help make possible?

Civil Beat’s reporting has helped paint a more complete picture of Hawaiʻi with stories that you won’t find anywhere else.

Your donation today will ensure that our newsroom has the resources to provide you with thorough, unbiased reporting on the issues that matter most to Hawaiʻi.

Give now. We can’t do this without you.

About the Author