City and County of Honolulu Charter Amendments
CHARTER QUESTION No. 1: Should the Charter require annual funding for a Food Security Fund, without having to simultaneously increase real property tax rates to fund the appropriation, to support programs and grants that provide locally grown or produced food to Oahu residents, as well as non-local food only in an emergency? Read Civil Beat coverage: Fund To Help Hungry Appears On Its Way To Honolulu’s November Ballot.
CHARTER QUESTION No. 2: Should the Charter be amended to replace its preamble with language recognizing the relationship between the people of the City and County of Honolulu and the ʻāina, honoring the wisdom of kūpuna and the legacy of Prince Jonah Kūhiō Kalanianaʻole, and affirming commitments to transparent, accountable government and stewardship of natural, civic, and cultural resources?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 3: Should an Office of ʻŌiwi Resources and Cultural Stewardship be established within the Office of the Mayor to oversee the management of ʻŌiwi resources within the City, develop related programs, and create a Cultural Advisory Council of kūpuna, cultural practitioners, and community representatives?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 4: Should a nine-member LGBTQIA+ Commission be established to advise the Mayor, City Council, and City agencies on matters affecting the LGBTQIA+ community and recommend policies, programs, and legislation promoting social, economic, and political equality?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 5: Beginning in 2032, should the City use ranked-choice voting to elect the Mayor, City Council, and Prosecuting Attorney, allowing voters to rank candidates in the order they prefer (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) in a single November election?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 6: Should the Charter be amended to require the Honolulu Police Department to 1) adopt policies to ensure the constitutional rights of all persons regardless of immigration or citizenship status are protected, and 2) assist federal immigration enforcement activities only when required by statute or court order, and after the requesting agency’s identity and authority have been confirmed? Read Civil Beat coverage: Voters Could Add Immigrant Protection Measures For HPD In November.
CHARTER QUESTION No. 7: Shall the Revised Charter of the City and County of Honolulu be amended to encourage increasing housing availability and preserving available housing as policies for the City and County of Honolulu?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 8: Should the Charter be amended to clarify that the Affordable Housing Fund is a revolving fund, with repayments, interest, earnings, proceeds, and other receipts derived from the Fund to be redeposited into the Fund?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 9: Should the Charter be amended to no longer require a second public hearing for any transaction related to City real property interests?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 10: Should the City be required to prepare and carry out a functional plan for the development of affordable housing?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 11: Should the Charter be amended to allow the Clean Water and Natural Lands Fund and the Climate Resiliency Fund to award grants to federal income tax-exempt non-profit organizations that provide services that are consistent with each Fund’s purpose?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 12: Should the Revised City Charter be amended to allow the Clean Water and Natural Lands Fund, Affordable Housing Fund, Climate Resiliency Fund, and other funds established under Section 9-204 to receive funding from federal, state, philanthropic, and other sources?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 13: Should the Charter be amended to allow the Clean Water and Natural Lands Fund to be used for historic preservation, and to preserve and protect buildings, sites, structures, and objects that have been acquired by the fund; to rename the Fund the Land, Natural Resources, and Historic Preservation Fund, and the advisory commission for the Fund the Land, Natural Resources, and Historic Preservation advisory commission; and to allocate proposal review for Fund use between the advisory commission and the Oʻahu Historic Preservation Commission
CHARTER QUESTION No. 14: Should the Charter be amended to increase the annual appropriation for costs related to operation, maintenance, and management of lands that were acquired using the Clean Water and Natural Lands Fund, from 5% of the moneys that were deposited into the Fund in the previous year, to 10%?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 15: Should an Office of Data and Innovation be established to use data to improve city services, promote government transparency and civic engagement, ensure that the city uses artificial intelligence responsibly, and protect residents’ digital privacy? Read Civil Beat coverage: Fate Of Proposed Data And Innovation Office In Oʻahu Voters Hands.
CHARTER QUESTION No. 16: Should permanent resident aliens who are residents of the City and County of Honolulu be permitted to serve on City boards and commissions?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 17: Should quorum and board action be based on the majority of members eligible to vote, excluding vacancies and non-voting members?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 18: Should the First Deputy of the Department of Human Resources be exempt from civil service provisions, like similar roles in other City departments?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 19: Should the City Clerk be required to provide technical and secretarial services to the Charter Commission?
CHARTER QUESTION No. 20: Should the Charter make a Councilmember, the Mayor, or the Prosecuting Attorney ineligible for election to any City office for two years if impeached, or if the official resigns after an impeachment petition has been filed, consistent with the provision for being recalled from office?
GO TO TOP